[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798223#comment-16798223
 ] 

Lucene/Solr QA commented on SOLR-13337:
---------------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  6s{color} 
| {color:red} SOLR-13337 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See 
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Creating_the_patch_file for help. 
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | SOLR-13337 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12963221/SOLR-13337.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SOLR-Build/347/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> TermsComponent sharded and terms.sort=index performance
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-13337
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13337
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: SearchComponents - other
>    Affects Versions: 7.7
>         Environment: Linux 64bit debian
> 20-node cluster
>            Reporter: Morten Bøgeskov
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-SOLR-13337-Avoid-requesting-unneeded-terms-from-shar.patch, 
> SOLR-13337.patch
>
>
> When the TermsComponet distributes across all shards, all (terms.limit=-1) 
> are returned.
> This ought not to be needed when using terms.sort=index.
> When using terms.lower=a in small test base (400k entries) it took 8.5-11.5s 
> to do a
> /terms?terms.fl=register&terms.sort=index&terms.lower=a I did not try it on 
> production data (10x)
> I do get the reason for getting all terms when sorting by count, however when 
> sorting by index, no more than the terms.limit number rows is required from 
> any shard. Most likely some will get discarded due to presence in more than 
> one shard. Given no term.min/maxcount (which definetely throws a spanner in 
> the works).
>  
> I've attached what I think would do the trick.
> I haven't actually tested the patch (it compiles, however some other files in 
> the checkout I have doesn't: ant compile, javac: "error: cannot find symbol")
>  
> Might be somewhat related issue (SOLR-2908). I didn't quite get the more 
> subtle information in it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to