[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16800763#comment-16800763
]
Thomas Wöckinger commented on SOLR-13331:
-----------------------------------------
Additional tests result in problems with following FieldType (Listing format:
FieldType / Expected Type / Given Type):
* BinaryField / ByteBuffer / byte[]
* CollationField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* DateRangeField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* EnumField / EnumFieldValue / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* EnumFieldType / EnumFieldValue / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* ExternalFileField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* ICUCollationField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* LatLonPointSpatialField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* LatLonType / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* PointType / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* RandomSortField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* StrField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* TextField / String / ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence
* UUIDField org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: TransactionLog doesn't know
how to serialize class java.util.UUID; try implementing ObjectResolver?
It seams there is another bug with UUIDField, i will create a different one.
>From my point of view it seems that changing the toNativeType int the class
>org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType
public Object toNativeType(Object val) {
if (val instanceof CharSequence) {
return ((CharSequence) val).toString();
}
return val;
}
> Atomic Update Multivalue remove does not work
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13331
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13331
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: UpdateRequestProcessors
> Affects Versions: 7.7, 7.7.1, 8.0
> Environment: Standalone Solr Server
> Reporter: Thomas Wöckinger
> Priority: Critical
>
> When using JavaBinCodec the values of collections are of type
> ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence, existing field values are Strings so the remove
> Operation does not have any effect.
> The relevant code is located in class AtomicUpdateDocumentMerger method
> doRemove.
> The method parameter fieldVal contains the collection values of type
> ByteArrayUtf8CharSequence, the variable original contains the collection of
> Strings
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
