[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16806254#comment-16806254
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6863:
--------------------------------------
It _is_ in every version of Lucene since 5.4. I suspect what gave rise to this
confusion is that the "Fix Version" has two versions. If it only had 5.4 then
I think you wouldn't of asked? FWIW I always use one version when resolving my
issues since I find doing otherwise to be confusing and redundant.
> Store sparse doc values more efficiently
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6863
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 5.4, 6.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6863.patch, LUCENE-6863.patch, LUCENE-6863.patch
>
>
> For both NUMERIC fields and ordinals of SORTED fields, we store data in a
> dense way. As a consequence, if you have only 1000 documents out of 1B that
> have a value, and 8 bits are required to store those 1000 numbers, we will
> not require 1KB of storage, but 1GB.
> I suspect this mostly happens in abuse cases, but still it's a pity that we
> explode storage requirements. We could try to detect sparsity and compress
> accordingly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
