[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16819882#comment-16819882
 ] 

ZhongHua Wu commented on LUCENE-8767:
-------------------------------------

BTW, I do test to add q.op=OR like:

q=(Versatil%20test)%20sundress&fl=name&defType=edismax&mm=2&qf=name^10%20partNumber_ntk&debugQuery=true&wt=xml&rows=1&q.op=OR

so this issue is not the same issue in 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3589Verstail

Even we want to achieve same effect, we want name:Versatil | name:test

> DisjunctionMaxQuery do not work well when multiple search term+mm+query 
> fields with different fieldType.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8767
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8767
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/queryparser
>    Affects Versions: 7.3
>         Environment: Solr: 7.3.1
> Backup:
> FieldType for name field:
> <fieldType name="forName" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100" 
> omitNorms="true">
>  <analyzer>
>  <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>  <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" 
> words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" />
>  <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1" 
> generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" 
>  splitOnCaseChange="0" preserveOriginal="1" splitOnNumerics="0"/>
>  <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>  <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory" language="English" 
> protected="protwords.txt" />
>  <filter class="solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory"/>
>  </analyzer>
>  </fieldType>
> FieldType for partNumber field:
> <fieldType name="forPartNumber" class="solr.TextField" sortMissingLast="true" 
> omitNorms="true">
>  <analyzer>
>  <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>  <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>  <filter class="solr.TrimFilterFactory" />
>  </analyzer>
>  </fieldType>
>            Reporter: ZhongHua Wu
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: patch
>
> When multiple fields in query fields came from different fieldType, 
> especially one from KeywordTokenizerFactory, another from 
> WhitespaceTokenizerFactory, then the generated parse query could not honor 
> synonyms and mm, which hit incorrect documents. The following is my detail:
>  # We use Solr 7.3.1
>  # Our qf=name^10 partNumber_ntk, while fieldType of name use 
> solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory and solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory, while  
> partNumber_ntk is not tokenized and use solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory
>  # mm=2<3 4<5 6<-80%25
>  # The search term is versatil sundress, while 'versatile' and 'testing' are 
> synonyms, we have documents named " Versatil Empire Waist Sundress" which 
> should be hit, but failed.
>  # We test same query on Solr 5.5.4, it works fine, it do not work on Solr 
> 7.3.1.
> q=
> (Versatil%20testing)%20sundress&fl=name&defType=edismax&mm=2<3 4<5 
> 6<-80%25&qf=name^10%20partNumber_ntk&debugQuery=true&wt=xml&rows=100
> parsedQuery:
> +(DisjunctionMaxQuery((((name:versatil name:test)~2)^10.0 | 
> partNumber_ntk:versatil testing)) DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name:sundress)^10.0 | 
> partNumber_ntk:sundress)))~2
> Which seems it incorrect parse name to: name:versatil name:test
> If I change the query fields to same fieldType, for example,shortDescription 
> is in same fieldType of name:
> q=(Versatil%20testing)%20sundress&fl=name&defType=edismax&mm=2<3 4<5 
> 6<-80%25&qf=name^10%20shortDescription&debugQuery=true&wt=xml&rows=100
> ParsedQuery:
> +((DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name:versatil)^10.0 | shortDescription:versatil)) 
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name:test)^10.0 | shortDescription:test))) 
> DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name:sundress)^10.0 | shortDescription:sundress)))~2
> which hits correctly.
> Could someone check this or tell us a quick workaround? Now it have big 
> impact on customer.
> Thanks in advance! The following is backup information:
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to