[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16849445#comment-16849445
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8362:
--------------------------------------
I had a quick look. The code organization looks good in general. However
BinaryRangeFieldRangeQuery seems to always return an empty set of docs? We
should also improve tests to verify the set of matched documents? I noticed a
leftover in IntRange where the encode method becomes public even though you are
not using it?
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8362
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Nicholas Knize
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-8362-approach2.patch, LUCENE-8362.patch,
> LUCENE-8362.patch
>
>
> I'm opening this issue to discuss adding DocValue support to
> {{\{Int|Long|Float|Double\}Range}} field types. Since existing numeric range
> fields already provide the methods for encoding ranges as a byte array I
> think this could be as simple as adding syntactic sugar to existing range
> fields that simply build an instance of {{BinaryDocValues}} using that same
> encoding. I'm envisioning something like
> {{doc.add(IntRange.newDocValuesField("intDV", 100)}} But I'd like to solicit
> other ideas or potential drawbacks to this approach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
