[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16855534#comment-16855534
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8796:
--------------------------------------
Hmm it's disappointing it's not making things noticeably faster, but in the
other hand your patch provides a better worst-case cost, in the case that
advance is always called by very small intervals. If I'm not mistaken, this
worst-case scenario runs in O(cost * log(cost)) today without your patch and
O(cost) with your patch.
> Use exponential search in IntArrayDocIdSet advance method
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8796
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Luca Cavanna
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Chatting with [~jpountz] , he suggested to improve IntArrayDocIdSet by making
> its advance method use exponential search instead of binary search. This
> should help performance of queries including conjunctions: given that
> ConjunctionDISI uses leap frog, it advances through doc ids in small steps,
> hence exponential search should be faster when advancing on average compared
> to binary search.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
