[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16872898#comment-16872898
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-12638:
-------------------------------------

What gnaws at me is that this "UpdateLog.openRealtimeSearcher" is being called 
optimistically on a new doc because _maaaayyyybeee_ some future atomic update 
will need to see it.  And not just any type of atomic update; one that is 
directly to a nested child doc.  It's as if we're optimizing for making that 
future atomic update faster by doing work in advance that will, I think, very 
rarely actually be used.  It's a tragedy, if I'm understanding this right.  If 
I do... then perhaps instead we somehow flag the UpdateLog to tell it that it's 
realtime searcher is "dirty" so it needs a new one _if_ it's asked for one.  
Just an idea off the top of my head.

> Support atomic updates of nested/child documents for nested-enabled schema
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: mosh
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.1
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-12638-delete-old-block-no-commit.patch, 
> SOLR-12638-nocommit.patch, SOLR-12638.patch, SOLR-12638.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 17h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have been toying with the thought of using this transformer in conjunction 
> with NestedUpdateProcessor and AtomicUpdate to allow SOLR to completely 
> re-index the entire nested structure. This is just a thought, I am still 
> thinking about implementation details. Hopefully I will be able to post a 
> more concrete proposal soon.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to