[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16873528#comment-16873528
 ] 

Namgyu Kim commented on LUCENE-8870:
------------------------------------

Thank you for your reply! [~jpountz] :D
{quote}My gut feeling is that trying to fold everything into a single field 
would make things more complicated rather than simpler.
{quote}
Yeah, I agree with some parts.
 I thought it would be nice to give more options to user.
 But if you think it can cause some confusions to users, I think remaining the 
current status is better.
{quote}About the TestField class,
 I think its class structure needs to be changed slightly.

It is no direct connection with this issue.
 But I plan to modify it like TestIntPoint, TestDoublePoint, ...
 Should not the test class name depend on the class name?
{quote}
By the way, what do you think about my first comment in this issue?
 It looks a little bit ambiguous, but I'm curious about your opinion.

> Support numeric value in Field class
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8870
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8870
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Namgyu Kim
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: LUCENE-8870.patch
>
>
> I checked the following comment in Field class.
> {code:java}
> // TODO: allow direct construction of int, long, float, double value too..?
> {code}
> We already have some fields like IntPoint and StoredField, but I think it's 
> okay.
> The test cases are set in the TestField class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to