[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-10213.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Removed copyField duplicate text from SchemaXml page in Confluence. Now it only
links to RefGuide.
PS: Do we need the SchemaXml page at all? I propose to delete it and focus on
the RefGuide.
> Copy Fields: remove wiki vs. cwiki overlap (and gap)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Minor
>
> We just stumbled across the 'are copy fields recursive/cascading' question
> again and on https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields found the
> answer which is "no" in the shape of the _The copy is done at the stream
> source level and no copy feeds into another copy._ sentence but
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Copying+Fields didn't seem
> to obviously have that answer although there is a _"... can/does copying
> happen recursively?"_ question hidden in the comments section.
> This ticket here proposes to:
> * fully remove the wiki section content in favour of just a pointer to the
> Solr Reference guide (cwiki)
> * review if anything on the wiki is missing and should be added to the cwiki
> * maybe: tidy up/remove some of the comments on the cwiki (the ones unrelated
> to the cwiki page itself)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
