Sure Christine. Sounds good. On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 9:21 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), < [email protected]> wrote:
> Would it be okay to include the LUCENE-8996 fix in the RC2 respin? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12983746/LUCENE-8996.patch > > Timeline-wise I think it could be committed tomorrow (Wednesday) London > time. > > Christine > > From: [email protected] At: 10/22/19 14:33:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.0 RC1 > > This voted has closed. We'll respin RC2 after SOLR-13855 is fixed. > > On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 6:52 PM jim ferenczi, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I backported the fix for >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9022 to the 8.3 branch. >> Thanks Uwe and Ishan. >> >> >> Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 15:09, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> [email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Okay, Jim. Let's respin and have it included as well. >>> >>> On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 6:36 PM Uwe Schindler, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, I would suggest to add this change. It's a big and as the other >>>> query was already fixed, that's needed for consistency, otherwise you would >>>> see strange bugs. >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> Am October 22, 2019 12:38:18 PM UTC schrieb jim ferenczi < >>>> [email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> If we respin I'd like to include >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9022 that makes all join >>>>> queries non-eligible for the query cache. >>>>> The fix is ready and approved so I can backport any time if you are ok >>>>> with it. >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 00:04, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> +1 to re-spin if this can be fixed quickly enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:30 AM David Smiley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I just discovered this: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13855 which is in effect >>>>>> since 8.1, Distributed URP in cloud mode doesn't propagate finish(). I >>>>>> see >>>>>> that Run URP further propagates this to the UpdateLog. Not doing this >>>>>> looks concerning to me. The bug should be easy to fix, which I plan to >>>>>> do >>>>>> if Bar Rotstein doesn't grab it very quickly. Maybe you/others can >>>>>> ascertain the seriousness but I want to raise awareness here. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ~ David Smiley >>>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:51 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.3.0 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.3.0-RC1-revd796eca84dbabe3ae9b3c27afc01ef3bee35acb1 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.3.0-RC1-revd796eca84dbabe3ae9b3c27afc01ef3bee35acb1 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 3 working days, i.e. until >>>>>> >> 2019-10-24 18:00 UTC. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Here is my +1 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> >>> >
