Yes, it does need to be updated. I was waiting to do that until I informed the user list about the change to not publish a PDF any longer which I’m ready to send now, so I’ll also fix the redirect link.
Cassandra On Oct 28, 2019, 12:23 PM -0500, Gus Heck <[email protected]>, wrote: > Ah yes I assumed that the original link had come from a good source... OTOH > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/field-types-included-with-solr.html > still needs to be updated to point to 8_2 I think. > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > : The redirection is wrong, if you remove "latest" from the urls with 8_1 > > > in > > > > > > The "redirection" rules appear to be working as designed -- but AFAIK they > > > were never designed with any idea of having a "latest/" path. > > > > > > the Latest URL has no is just the page name w/o a version number, not the > > > page name prefixed with "latest/". > > > > > > Specifically this is suppose to be the "latest" URL for the page in > > > question... > > > > > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/field-types-included-with-solr.html > > > > > > : > I was trying to access > > > : > > > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/latest/field-types-included-with-solr.html > > > > > > ...where did you find that link? > > > > > > I'm pretty sure the place that linked to that URL is the place that has a > > > mistake. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Hoss > > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
