The maven wagon issue looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170> which doesn’t seem to affect everybody. SystemCollectionCompatTest failures are already tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14128 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14128> - perhaps this should be marked as a BadApple?
The smoke tests run a bunch of extra tests - things like spinning up a Solr instance and indexing some documents, checks on the NOTICE.txt, etc. > On 18 Mar 2020, at 08:51, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com > <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> wrote: > > I you installed python3 through homebrew it can be that SSL root certificates > are not updated. > There seems to be a few workarounds here > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44649449/brew-installation-of-python-3-6-1-ssl-certificate-verify-failed-certificate > > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44649449/brew-installation-of-python-3-6-1-ssl-certificate-verify-failed-certificate> > Or simply download and install python3 from the python website... > > Jan > >> 17. mar. 2020 kl. 21:59 skrev Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com >> <mailto:msoko...@gmail.com>>: >> >> smoke tester failed for me with "SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED" >> although curl is able to retrieve the dist.apache.org >> <http://dist.apache.org/> URL. Possibly >> there is some problem with my Python's CA bundle, but if so I'm not >> sure how to resolve at the moment. I checked out the 8.5 branch and >> ran "ant nightly-smoke" instead ... this failed with an error >> downloading from maven .. >> >> Path to dependency: >> 1) unspecified:unspecified:jar:0.0 >> 2) org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-ssh:jar:1.0-beta-7 >> >> not sure what's up with that - maybe another environmental issue on my >> end? I'm not even really sure what nightly-smoke is for: is that what >> the smoke tester runs? So I finally ran ant test. I had one failure >> (org.apache.solr.cloud.SystemCollectionCompatTest.testBackCompat) that >> did also reproduce when I re-ran it (and took 4 minutes to run!), and >> then finally succeeded on the third try (taking only 25 seconds). It >> seems to have two modes (slow/fail and less slow/succeed). I'm not >> sure if it's helpful but here's a failing seed from a 3m31s run: >> 639CE74EEAFDB01C. >> >> I don't think this is enough to vote one way or the other; I'd like to >> help out in the future though, so I'll try to sort out the CA issue. >> I'm also curious if anyone can explain what nightly-smoke does, or in >> general how smoke testing is related to unit tests - is it a different >> set of tests? More comprehensive? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:08 AM jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jim.feren...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> SUCCESS! [1:18:55.683704] >>> >>> Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 01:35, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org >>> <mailto:md...@apache.org>> a écrit : >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> All testing was with Java 11.0.5 >>>> >>>> Smoke tester didn't work (expected) >>>> >>>> Manually ran lucene and solr tests, had a few solr failures but they >>>> passed when rerunning individually. >>>> Went through the tutorial, have a few minor updates to make that I'll take >>>> care of in the next few days but nothing critical. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:12 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe >>>> <tomasflo...@gmail.com <mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> SUCCESS! [1:20:34.327672] >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:kris...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:24:43.574849] >>>>>> >>>>>> Kevin Risden >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:40 PM Nhat Nguyen >>>>>> <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid <mailto:nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:52:39.991003] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:14 AM Cassandra Targett >>>>>>> <casstarg...@gmail.com <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I pushed the Solr Ref Guide DRAFT up this morning (thought I did it on >>>>>>>> Friday, sorry): https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/ >>>>>>>> <https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/>. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cassandra >>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2020, 6:06 PM -0500, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>>>> <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>>, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I instructed Policeman Jenkins to automatically test the release for >>>>>>>> me, the result (Java 8 / Java 9 combined Smoketesting): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:24:47.422173] >>>>>>>> (see >>>>>>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/30/console >>>>>>>> <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/30/console>) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also downloaded the artifacts and tested manually: >>>>>>>> - Solr starts and stops perfectly on Windows with whitespace in path >>>>>>>> name: Java 8, Java 11 and Java 14 (coming out soon) >>>>>>>> - Javadocs of Lucene look fine >>>>>>>> - JAR files look good >>>>>>>> - All links to repos in pom.xml and ant use HTTPS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So I am fine with releasing this. >>>>>>>> +1 to RELEASE! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Uwe >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/> >>>>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 3:27 PM >>>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.0-RC1- >>>>>>>> rev7ac489bf7b97b61749b19fa2ee0dc46e74b8dc42 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.0-RC1- >>>>>>>> rev7ac489bf7b97b61749b19fa2ee0dc46e74b8dc42 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for three working days i.e. until next Tuesday, >>>>>>>> 2020-03- >>>>>>>> 18 14:00 UTC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >>>>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >
