+1 binding 

Sent from a mobile device

> On 12. May 2020, at 13:33, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> -1 (binding)
> 
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Alan Woodward
>> 
>>>> On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Jan Høydahl
>>> 
>>>> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>>> 
>>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>>> independent entities.
>>>> 
>>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>>> 
>>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>>> 
>>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>>> 
>>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>>> 
>>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>>>> and cast a vote.
>>>> 
>>>> Dawid
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>> [2] 
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to