+1 On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:20, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch >>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer >>> nkn...@apache.org >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili < >>>> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Tommaso >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >>>>>> >>>>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >>>>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache >>>>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two >>>>>> independent entities. >>>>>> >>>>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems >>>>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10 >>>>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and >>>>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers, >>>>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make >>>>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP. >>>>>> >>>>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a >>>>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The >>>>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the >>>>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are >>>>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I >>>>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible -- >>>>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I >>>>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put >>>>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the >>>>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and >>>>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC, >>>>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be >>>>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines): >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal >>>>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal >>>>>> >>>>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to >>>>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding >>>>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read >>>>>> and cast a vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dawid >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>>>> [2] >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen
