[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13109182#comment-13109182
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2786:
--------------------------------
I don't necessarily think we need to include an additional copy of the lucene
jars in the solr binary distribution, but i'm open to considering it.
i would suggest maybe just better documentation on what jars are needed for
people doing embedded solr, or perhaps a simple ant target to extract then from
the solr.war (so we don't have to double up again)
for that matter: now i'm wondering if maybe we should stop shipping *any* jar
that's also in the war, and just provide an ant build file that pulls them out
if people want to write java apps that use them (ie: embedded *or* solrj apps).
opinions?
> solr binary releases do not include readily available copies of all lucene
> jars
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2786
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2786
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> a user on the mailing list was asking a question about embedded solr, and was
> getting class not found errors for lucene core classes - which made me
> realize that the only place lucene jars are available in the solr binary
> release is embedded inside the solr war, which is not entirely obvious to
> users who are trying to develope java applications around solr
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
