> IMHO this vote is invalid because... > it doesn’t include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver
I considered the latest submission by Dustin Haver to be his submission, but I can see how some might like the other better and it should have been part of the vote. > I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions. Given that I omitted the submission above, that seems reasonable. And since we are restarting, I guess we can allow Baris to add in an entry. Baris, please add your entry to the jira issue. I will restart the vote next week. > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting" I considered rank voting, but tallying a rank vote by hand can be incredibly tedious. I don't think we should use any external tools since that prohibits verification on who is voting from the PMC. However, given the lastingness of this decision, I guess it is fair to do the necessary harder tallying work of rank choice voting over email. When I restart the vote, I will give instructions on making multiple selections. So, consider this vote CLOSED and VOID. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:27 AM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting": > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting > If you create a Google Form based submission which supports a ranked > choice input, then this should make it probably not hard to tally the > results correctly. A PMC boolean would be helpful too. > > ~ David > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Andrzej Białecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote: > >> IMHO this vote is invalid because it doesn’t include all submissions >> linked to that issue. Specifically, it doesn’t include the red / orange >> variants submitted by Dustin Haver (which I personally prefer over the >> sickly green ones … ;) ) >> >> I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions. >> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 17:04, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A. (PMC) I like that it retains the same idea as our current logo with a >> more modern look. >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:58 PM Andi Vajda <o...@ovaltofu.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> C. (current logo) >>> >>> Andi.. (pmc) >>> >>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 15:08, Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >>> >>> In February a contest was started to design a new logo for Lucene [1]. >>> That contest concluded, and I am now (admittedly a little late!) calling a >>> vote. >>> >>> The entries are labeled as follows: >>> >>> A. Submitted by Dustin Haver [2] >>> >>> B. Submitted by Stamatis Zampetakis [3] Note that this has several >>> variants. Within the linked entry there are 7 patterns and 7 color >>> palettes. Any vote for B should contain the pattern number, like B1 or B3. >>> If a B variant wins, we will have a followup vote on the color palette. >>> >>> C. The current Lucene logo [4] >>> >>> Please vote for one of the three (or nine depending on your >>> perspective!) above choices. Note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community >>> is invited to express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr PMC cast >>> binding votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). This vote >>> will close one week from today, Mon, June 22, 2020. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221 >>> [2] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen%20Shot%202020-04-10%20at%208.29.32%20AM.png >>> [3] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf >>> [4] >>> https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> >>
