So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix this issue. Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted and some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling policy from 8.6.0.
Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. Please speak up if there is any disagreement. - Houston On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so because > Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it would be better > if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the issue right away > anyway. > > On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <ilans...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the issue? >> >> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> a écrit : >> >>> +1, thanks Houston. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer to do the >>> release. >>> > >>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have to take an >>> action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users haven't upgraded to >>> 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make life easier for >>> everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading from 8.6 to >>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > > +1 >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a default >>> autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then 8.6.1, does the >>> default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so we probably >>> want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix this issue >>> once upgrading. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > - Houston >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> Hi, >>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 release >>> due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant an immediate bug >>> fix release. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be unable to >>> volunteer for this release owning to some other commitments, however >>> Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to volunteer for this post >>> 27th. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>> >> > >> Regards, >>> >> > >> Ishan >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Regards, >>> >> > >>> >> > Atri >>> >> > Apache Concerted >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Regards, >>> >> >>> >> Atri >>> >> Apache Concerted >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Atri >>> Apache Concerted >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>>
