I think you need a sort of ‘ordered atLeast’ here. Currently atLeast() is a
mixture of a disjunction and an unordered interval, it should be possible to
add something that adds additional constraints to the sets that it finds. I
think you’d need to write some code though, I can’t see a way of doing it with
the current group of interval operators.
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 14:20, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm... Is there any way to express a query for a phrase-like sequence of
> tokens:
>
> a b c d
>
> but with potential "holes" (one or more terms missing):
>
> - b c d
> a - c d
> a b - d
> ...
>
> I've experimented with ordered(term("a"), term(b), ...), gaps and
> atLeast but I can't get it to work. I could expand terms into several
> queries manually but the number of potential subsets is quite large,
> hence the question. Thanks for tips.
>
> Dawid
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
