Thank you for your answer! I suppose we will just update it to the latest Solr version then after some preceding discussion.
Kind regards, Piotr Szuberski On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:08 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe you are referring to SolrJ? Generally speaking, SolrJ has been very > compatible communicating to many backend Solr server versions. I wish we > tracked problems about this specifically somewhere, but I don't think we > do. I suggest simply using the latest SolrJ release. If you find issues, > report them. Again, assuming SolrJ, it's good to have some flexibility on > which SolrClient subclass is used. There's Cloud vs not (i.e. standalone), > there's newer HTTP2 vs not. There's Cloud talking directly to ZooKeeper > for cluster state, or there's via Solr HTTP. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:07 PM Piotr Szuberski < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are working on dependency updates at Apache Beam and I would like to >> consult which versions should be supported so we don't break any existing >> users. >> >> Previously the supported Solr version was 5.5.4. >> >> Versions 8.x.y and 7.x.y naturally come to mind as they are the only not >> deprecated. But maybe there are users that use some earlier versions? >> >> Are these versions backwards-compatible or there are things to be aware >> of? >> >> Regards, >> Piotr >> > -- *Piotr Szuberski* Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Junior Software Engineer E: [email protected] Unique Tech Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>
