Thanks Ishan, I had misunderstood! On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:12 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Adrien, > I don't suggest we do so in 8.7, unless there's CVE that need immediate > addressing. +1 to removing in branch_8x. > Thanks, > Ishan > > On Fri, 30 Oct, 2020, 11:22 pm Adrien Grand, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ishan, why would this be a blocker for 8.7? Would it be good enough to >> remove in branch_8x? >> >> Le ven. 30 oct. 2020 à 18:33, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> [email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> +1 to removing it (in 8.7 with a respin, if needed). If we can't support >>> it, there's no need to keep it. If someone wants, they can assume ownership >>> of a third party package. +1 to removing all non essential code and >>> trimming down the Solr distribution. There's no good reason for Solr, which >>> is in effect just a distributed layer on top of Lucene, to be a 200MB >>> download. >>> >>> On Fri, 30 Oct, 2020, 9:50 pm Uwe Schindler, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I fully agree with Erick, >>>> >>>> Please don't start and try to get 8.x on Java 11. Release Lucene/Solr 9! >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> eMail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >>>> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:39 PM >>>> > To: [email protected] >>>> > Subject: Re: Solr 8.x and contribs requiring Java 11 >>>> > >>>> > I’m always reluctant to change something like this for a point >>>> release. >>>> > >>>> > I’ve been supposing that we’d release Solr 9 for a while, I always >>>> thought >>>> > that moving to Java 11 would be a driver for the 9.0 release but I >>>> wasn’t >>>> > correct in that. >>>> > >>>> > That expectation has been complicated by the whole reference impl >>>> thing. >>>> > >>>> > What I’d suggest is that we push forward with a 9.0 release and >>>> consider >>>> > it something of a placeholder while the reference impl either becomes >>>> > our main line or doesn’t. Then your problem disappears ;). >>>> Unfortunately, >>>> > a new major release always takes some time. >>>> > >>>> > FWIW, >>>> > Erick >>>> > >>>> > > On Oct 30, 2020, at 10:30 AM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > I've run into this in SOLR-14974. The dependency is on Java 11. >>>> > > Everything works if you build and run under Java 11 but of course it >>>> > > won't fly on Java 8 (won't even compile). >>>> > > >>>> > > I wonder what are your thoughts on keeping Java 8 as the minimum for >>>> > > Solr 8x. Is 8.x going to be on Java 8 forever? Or is minimum of Java >>>> > > 11 a possibility, only nobody got to it yet? >>>> > > >>>> > > Dawid >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> -- Adrien
