Hi David, Thanks for sharing. I am sure I will have thoughts on this, but won’t be able to substantively comment until January. Just letting you know that there is interest and not to be discouraged if you get only silence for a while.
Hopefully others will look and comment as well. Mike On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:00 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > There's lots of exciting work going on in Solr at the moment, judging from > the SIPs & some JIRA issues. I want to draw attention to my proposal for > shared storage in SolrCloud that I call "BlobDirectory" -- SOLR-15051 [1]. > It has a linked proposal document[2] in Google Docs. If any of you have > comments / concerns on the design, now is a good time to share them. I > expect to share a very early draft WIP PR today, containing an early form > of only some of the components. I'll repeat the issue description here: > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15051 > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kjQPK80sLiZJyRjek_Edhokfc5q9S3ISvFRM2_YeL8M/edit?usp=sharing > ---- > > This proposal is a way to accomplish shared storage in SolrCloud with a > few key characteristics: (A) using a Directory implementation, (B) > delegates to a backing local file Directory as a kind of read/write cache > (C) replicas have their own "space", (D) , de-duplication across replicas > via reference counting, (E) uses ZK but separately from SolrCloud stuff. > > The Directory abstraction is a good one, and helps isolate shared storage > from the rest of SolrCloud that doesn't care. Using a backing normal file > Directory is faster for reads and is simpler than Solr's HDFSDirectory's > BlockCache. Replicas having their own space solves the problem of multiple > writers (e.g. of the same shard) trying to own and write to the same space, > and it implies that any of Solr's replica types can be used along with what > goes along with them like peer-to-peer replication (sometimes > faster/cheaper than pulling from shared storage). A de-duplication feature > solves needless duplication of files across replicas and from parent shards > (i.e. from shard splitting). The de-duplication feature requires a place > to cache directory listings so that they can be shared across replicas and > atomically updated; this is handled via ZooKeeper. Finally, some sort of > Solr daemon / auto-scaling code should be added to implement > "autoAddReplicas", especially to provide for a scenario where the leader is > gone and can't be replicated from directly but we can access shared storage. > > For more about shared storage concepts, consider looking at the > description in SOLR-13101 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13101> and the linked Google > Doc. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >
