+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:04:04.738835] Tested with a sample app, basic indexing, search, and went through the UI. Looks good.
Thanks for the effort, Tim! On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 6:42 PM Timothy Potter <[email protected]> wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.1-RC2-rev64f3b496bfee762a9d2dbff40700f457f4464dfe > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.1-RC2-rev64f3b496bfee762a9d2dbff40700f457f4464dfe > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-02-20 03:00 > UTC. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [0:50:07.947952] > > Also, as with RC1, in addition to the smoke test, I built a Docker > image from the RC locally and verified: > > a. A rolling upgrade of a 3-node 8.7.0 cluster to the 8.8.1 RC > completes successfully w/o any NPEs or weirdness with leader election > / recoveries. > b. The base_url property is stored in replica state after the upgrade > c. A basic client application built with SolrJ 8.7.0 can load cluster > state info directly from ZK and query the 8.8.1 RC2 servers. > d. Same client app built with SolrJ 8.8.0 works as well. > > As this bug-fix release is primarily needed to address a SolrJ > back-compat break (SOLR-15145) and unfortunately our smoke tester > framework does not test for backcompat of older SolrJ against the RC, > I ask others to please test rolling upgrades of servers (ideally > multi-node clusters) running pre-8.8.0 to this RC if possible. Also, > please try client applications that are using an older SolrJ, esp. > those that load cluster state directly from ZK. > > Best regards, > Tim > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Anshum Gupta
