This seems like a scary approach, why must deprecations be all removed at once? And why rush doing this for some specific date? No need to create bugs like this.
Why not make separate issues to handle each deprecation carefully. By the way, I feel this approach is a losing battle IMO anyway, because we may add new deprecations at any time. We just added new ones Friday for LUCENE-9480 as an example. It is a good way to fix the code iteratively. On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:33 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two linked issues pertaining to the removal of deprecations for > 9.0: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13138 > and a branch where this work has been done: > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master-deprecations > > I'm just calling attention to this because I think this ideally will get > done before the source control split of the projects because there is one > (existing) branch covering both. And it needn't prevent an 8.9 from > happening either. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >
