I am not sure how this happened, it was a comment form another thread, whatever i deleted it
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:48 AM David Smiley (Jira) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17289656#comment-17289656 > ] > > David Smiley commented on SOLR-15064: > ------------------------------------- > > [~thomas.woeckinger], I'll respond to a comment you left on a linked issue > that I think is meant to go here: > > bq. Is there always a route parameter present? Especially when using > prefix routing or implicit router with document > fields? > > No; it's quite optional and most users I think don't know about it (for > indexing) let alone use it. It's not added internally. > > bq. But anyway, it would be great if the flag can be avoided at all. Just > for understanding this means that RTG is not used if only a 'root' document > is involved (having child documents is irrelevant)? > > I don't know what you mean. > > > > > > Atomic/partial updates to nested docs should not assume _route_ param is > the root ID > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Key: SOLR-15064 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064 > > Project: Solr > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Environment: Updating to make a blocker for 9.0 because I > _really_ want to remove the 9.0 hack RE {{\_route_}} param. I don't think > I'll get around to updating the routing logic to look at a {{\_root_}} > field, and it's nice knowing we have a work-around By using the {{/32!}} > separator. Another work-around would be using {{router.field=\_root_}} if > you _always_ pass in this field. > > Reporter: David Smiley > > Assignee: David Smiley > > Priority: Blocker > > Labels: NestedDocuments > > Fix For: master (9.0) > > > > > > In SOLR-14923, doing an atomic/partial update to a child doc requires > indicating what the root doc ID is. Formerly Solr tried to figure this out > automatically, but that had costly implications. SOLR-14923 adds a > temporary hack that assumes that the \_route_ paramter *is* the root ID, if > the \_root_ field is not on the doc. But that's not necessarily accurate, > so it should be removed. > > > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > (v8.3.4#803005) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
