LUCENE-9744 and LUCENE-9762 are both backported.

> On 30 Mar 2021, at 09:03, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike, 
> 
> LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!
> 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch 
> instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on 
> that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
> 
> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d like 
> to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only, though.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com 
> <mailto:md...@mdrob.com>>, wrote:
>> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there 
>> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some 
>> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on 
>> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up 
>> about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>> 
>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build 
>> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the 
>> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and 
>> building, etc.
>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com 
>> <mailto:md...@mdrob.com>>, wrote:
>> 
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is 
>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant 
>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com 
>> <https://mailto:romseyg...@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>> 
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) 
>> and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>> 
>> Thanks, Alan
>> 
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com 
>> <https://mailto:iver...@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that 
>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only 
>> touches one class tho so very low risk.
>> 
>> lucene  
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com 
>> <https://mailto:md...@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>> Ishan,
>> 
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to 
>> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>> 
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>> 
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with 
>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com/>> 
>> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>> 
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288> in, but will likely be 
>> able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival 
>> of Holi)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>> 
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <md...@mdrob.com 
>> <https://mailto:md...@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>> 
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have 
>> small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your 
>> best judgement.
>> 
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>> 
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>   the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>>   a release candidate build.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>> 

Reply via email to