Hello Colvin, I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr 8.9 release? Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)?
Thank you. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC logging > when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could have a > look at it in time for 8.9 that would be great > > > > Thanks, > > Colvin > > > > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mayya, > >> > >> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge for > stored fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch is ready, but > we prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if > it's okay with the release plan. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Nhat > >> > >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 should be > investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker? > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help out: > >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 > >>>> > >>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main branch > >>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking: > >>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult > >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change > >>>> moving forwards though) > >>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which > >>>> add noise to merging against old code. > >>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky > >>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due to > >>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong. > >>>> > >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it > >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test > >>>> coverage that helps combat risks. > >>>> > >>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x IMO: > >>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it is > harder. > >>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than > >>>> usual? even a few days really helps. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova > >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > Thanks everyone, > >>>> > > >>>> > Adrien, I am happy to try to be a release manager for this release. > >>>> > > >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged to > 8.x > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 into some sort of 8x. > I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene tickets that are > related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow.... > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for the > version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before delving > further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does that. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a > performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as soon > as possible. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> +1 > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager? > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> +1 > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova < > mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, > >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been > more than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. > >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Thanks. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> -- > >>>> >>> Adrien > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > >>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
