Thanks very much everyone for running tests!
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Timothy Potter <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:09:07.601567] > > Also, fired up the bin/solr -e cloud example and ran through the Admin UI > > Thanks Mayya! > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:48 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi again, short update to my previous mail: > > > > New maven metadata artifacts work fine, I was able to build a Solr > plugin of a customer after adding 2 repos to its POM. It then downloaded > the internet and Solr and plugin built sucessfully (including tests using > the solr test framework, indirectly also testing lucene test framework): > > > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Total time: 02:27 min > > [INFO] Finished at: 2021-06-15T19:44:09+02:00 > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > In case you want to try: > > > > <repositories> > > <repository> > > <id>lucene</id> > > <url> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/lucene/maven/ > </url> > > </repository> > > <repository> > > <id>solr</id> > > <url> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/solr/maven/ > </url> > > </repository> > > </repositories> > > > > You can also try this out, but be sure to remove the dowloaded artifacts > from your local repository, if we need to respin the release process! > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:27 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1 > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:24:00.227990] > > > > > > Policeman Jenkins tested it for me: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr- > > > Release-Tester/36/console > > > I had not much time to do my own checks of targz artifacts, so I trust > the > > > technical workflow. > > > > > > I only checked the maven folders and verified that the new POM layout > looks > > > fine, but I did not do a test build of a Solr plugin this time (I did > this before > > > committing the change). The release artifacts are a bit complicated to > use as > > > it's 2 repos. > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > ----- > > > Uwe Schindler > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Atri Sharma <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:00 PM > > > > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:32:12.04043] > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:27 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:36:12.056443] > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mayya Sharipova > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations. > > > > >> > > > > >> Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures. Failures > are not > > > > reproducible on my local machine. > > > > >> > > > > >> build #13: ant test -Dtestcase=SolrCloudReportersTest - > > > > Dtests.method=testExplicitConfiguration > -Dtests.seed=60FEAB39C2B47705 - > > > > Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=ro-RO > -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Brazzaville - > > > > Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 > > > > >> build# 12: ant test -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest - > > > > Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=BB301A174F4BDB5 - > > > > Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.locale=sr-Latn-RS > -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Bissau - > > > > Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1 > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> OK I managed to finally get this smoketester to pass on my > machine, so > > > > >>> for THIS release I will retract my -1 and change it to a +1. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I have reset my system configuration back though, so we should > really > > > > >>> fix these test problems for the future. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> SUCCESS! [1:08:26.448122] > > > > >>> > > > > >>> There were a few compounding issues, I will break out some > issues a > > > > >>> bit later. I don't think they need to be blockers for THIS > release, > > > > >>> but let's please fix them! I can help try to dig on each one, > but here > > > > >>> are the biggest two problems: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> 1. some solr tests don't obey their sandbox and fail with > > > > >>> tests.workDir (if it is set in the user's build.properties). > These > > > > >>> tests try to access wrong parts of the filesystem which can cause > > > > >>> tests to meddle with each other. obeying the test sandbox > > > > >>> (tests.workDir) is important, it is how I prevent these tests > from > > > > >>> destroying my SSDs. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> 2. some solr HDFS tests will falsely fail if they "think" disk > space > > > > >>> is low (even when it is not running out). They dump megabytes of > > > > >>> output, but this part is the key: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) > [ ] > > > > >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas, > > > > >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[], > > > > >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], > > > > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, > newBlock=true) > > > > >>> For more information, please enable DEBUG log level on > > > > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.BlockPlacementPolicy > > > > and > > > > >>> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetworkTopology > > > > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) > [ ] > > > > >>> o.a.h.h.p.BlockStoragePolicy Failed to place enough replicas: > expected > > > > >>> size is 2 but only 0 storage types can be selected > (replication=2, > > > > >>> selected=[], unavailable=[DISK], removed=[DISK, DISK], > > > > >>> policy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], > > > > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}) > > > > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000960 WARN (IPC Server handler 3 on 33951) > [ ] > > > > >>> o.a.h.h.s.b.BlockPlacementPolicy Failed to place enough replicas, > > > > >>> still in need of 2 to reach 2 (unavailableStorages=[DISK], > > > > >>> storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, storageTypes=[DISK], > > > > >>> creationFallbacks=[], replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]}, > newBlock=true) > > > > >>> All required storage types are unavailable: > > > > >>> unavailableStorages=[DISK], > storagePolicy=BlockStoragePolicy{HOT:7, > > > > >>> storageTypes=[DISK], creationFallbacks=[], > > > > >>> replicationFallbacks=[ARCHIVE]} > > > > >>> [junit4] 2> 1000961 WARN (Thread-2642) [ ] > > > > >>> o.a.h.h.DataStreamer DataStreamer Exception > > > > >>> [junit4] 2> => > > > > >>> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(java.io.IOException): File > > > > >>> /testfile could only be written to 0 of the 1 minReplication > nodes. > > > > >>> There are 2 datanode(s) running and 2 node(s) are excluded in > this > > > > >>> operation. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> So I think these tests should be tweaked to not require > gigabytes of > > > > >>> free space to pass. (fix the threshold or whatever, or add an > assume > > > > >>> or something). I worked around the situation by temporarily > > > > >>> repartitioning and giving them another gigabyte (!). In no event > was > > > > >>> there ever any danger of running out of space! They just falsely > fail > > > > >>> even when there are hundreds of MB available. Seems they have > some > > > > >>> kind of bogus threshold in the algorithm (e.g. inspecting > percentages > > > > >>> or something). > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > The tests also aren't "timing out". They are failing. > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Robert Muir <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even > close. I have > > > > >>> > > 20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs. > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > > >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out > on your > > > > machine due to lack of resources? Can you try running them with just > just one > > > > JVM at a time? > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Sat, 12 Jun, 2021, 8:20 pm Robert Muir, < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous > tests fail: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: A3FDDCE09965D7AE] > (first 10 > > > > out of 18): > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog > (suite) > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HDFSCollectionsAPITest.testDataDirIsNotReused > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest > > > (suite) > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te > > > > stCanDistinguishBetweenFilesAndDirectories > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te > > > > stCanDeleteEmptyOrFullDirectories > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te > > > > stCanDeleteIndividualFiles > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.backup.repository.HdfsBackupRepositoryIntegrationTest.te > > > > stArbitraryFileDataCanBeStoredAndRetrieved > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.72 .. 1241.80 = 1241.08s > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.67 .. 1198.72 = 1198.05s > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.91 .. 1198.75 = 1197.84s > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] Execution time total: 20 minutes 41 seconds > > > > >>> > > >> [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 > tests, 3 > > > > >>> > > >> suite-level errors, 15 errors, 1 failure, 2581 ignored > (506 > > > > >>> > > >> assumptions) > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM Robert Muir > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > After nuking all settings (i simply removed the whole > > > > >>> > > >> > lucene.build.properties in my homedir), it still fails. > Seems maybe > > > > >>> > > >> > like less failures though? > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I will upload logs to the JIRA issue. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Completed [939/939 (4!)] on J2 in 383.02s, > 2 tests, 1 > > > > >>> > > >> > failure <<< FAILURES! > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: > AC205159663D0461]: > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > > > > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite) > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > org.apache.solr.core.HdfsDirectoryFactoryTest.testLocalityReporter > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testBasic > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest.testMultiThreaded > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest > > > > (suite) > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] - > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestLocalFSCloudBackupRestore.test > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J0: 0.68 .. 1197.30 = 1196.62s > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J1: 0.71 .. 1113.59 = 1112.89s > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] JVM J2: 0.68 .. 1406.83 = 1406.15s > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Execution time total: 23 minutes 26 seconds > > > > >>> > > >> > [junit4] Tests summary: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 > tests, 3 > > > > >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored > (517 > > > > >>> > > >> > assumptions) > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > BUILD FAILED > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un > > > > pack/solr-8.9.0/solr/build.xml:231: > > > > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un > > > > pack/solr-8.9.0/solr/common-build.xml:550: > > > > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un > > > > pack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1608: > > > > >>> > > >> > The following error occurred while executing this line: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un > > > > pack/solr-8.9.0/lucene/common-build.xml:1135: > > > > >>> > > >> > There were test failures: 939 suites (5 ignored), 4884 > tests, 3 > > > > >>> > > >> > suite-level errors, 4 errors, 1 failure, 2457 ignored > (517 > > > > >>> > > >> > assumptions) [seed: AC205159663D0461] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > Total time: 24 minutes 16 seconds > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 1495, in <module> > > > > >>> > > >> > main() > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 1417, in main > > > > >>> > > >> > smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, > c.tmp_dir, > > > > >>> > > >> > c.is_signed, c.local_keys, ' '.join(c.test_args), > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 1483, in smokeTest > > > > >>> > > >> > solrSrcUnpackPath = unpackAndVerify(java, 'solr', > tmpDir, > > > > >>> > > >> > 'solr-%s-src.tgz' % version, > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 566, in unpackAndVerify > > > > >>> > > >> > verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, > gitRevision, > > > > >>> > > >> > version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL) > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 687, in verifyUnpacked > > > > >>> > > >> > java.run_java8('ant clean test -Dtests.slow=false > %s' % > > > testArgs, > > > > >>> > > >> > '%s/test.log' % unpackPath) > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 1212, in run_java > > > > >>> > > >> > run('%s; %s' % (cmd_prefix, cmd), logfile) > > > > >>> > > >> > File "/home/rmuir/workspace/lucene-solr/dev- > > > > tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", > > > > >>> > > >> > line 500, in run > > > > >>> > > >> > raise RuntimeError('command "%s" failed; see log > file %s' % > > > > >>> > > >> > (command, logPath)) > > > > >>> > > >> > RuntimeError: command "export > > > > >>> > > >> > JAVA_HOME="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08" > > > > >>> > > >> > PATH="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin:$PATH" > > > > >>> > > >> > JAVACMD="/home/rmuir/Downloads/jdk8u282-b08/bin/java"; > > > ant > > > > clean test > > > > >>> > > >> > -Dtests.slow=false -Dtests.badapples=false " failed; > see log file > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > /tmp/smoke_lucene_8.9.0_05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/un > > > > pack/solr-8.9.0/test.log > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:47 AM Robert Muir > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I nuked all my settings and am rerunning with all > defaults. I'll > > > > >>> > > >> > > report back what happens/upload log when/if it > finishes or > > > fails. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Sokolov > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be > timing out. > > > > Now > > > > >>> > > >> > > > when I go back, SOLR issues are marked as "You > can't view > > > this > > > > issue > > > > >>> > > >> > > > It may have been deleted or you don't have > permission to > > > view > > > > it." > > > > >>> > > >> > > > Waat? > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > Anyway, Robert you suggested there that maybe the > problem > > > is > > > > being > > > > >>> > > >> > > > surfaced by using a different working directory for > the tests. > > > Do > > > > you > > > > >>> > > >> > > > think that the tests need to be fixed so that they > work with > > > this > > > > >>> > > >> > > > tmp.workDir parameter? What if you were to cd to > the place > > > > you want to > > > > >>> > > >> > > > use as the working dir and call the smokeTester > from there? > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Mayya Sharipova > > > > >>> > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > Thanks very much Robert for detailed > investigations, and > > > > thanks Jan for your tests. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > I will sort out the problem with my GPG key, but > I am not > > > > sure what to do with this SOLR-15473. I've run the smoker test > again, and it > > > > passed on my Mac again: SUCCESS! [1:00:03.751500] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > Would appreciate more guidance, if we need to > resolve > > > SOLR- > > > > 15473 before 8.9 release. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:09 AM Robert Muir > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> Dude, if you can vote +1 when the smoketester > passes, > > > then > > > > I can vote > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> -1 when it fails. This is my vote, not your > vote. You don't > > > get > > > > to > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> decide about it, or change it in any way. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Jan Høydahl > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting > a bug in > > > Solr > > > > that we cannot ship, or only a bug in the smoketester py itself? The > -1 should > > > > be about the released bits, not about other tooling? > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > My JVM is OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM > > > > (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed mode) > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > Jan > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > 11. jun. 2021 kl. 13:48 skrev Robert Muir > > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > Jan, I'm using the same automated > smoketester as > > > > everyone else. It > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > fails, so my vote is -1. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jan Høydahl > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other > verification than > > > > smoketester done > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> +1 > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Robert - not sure if one test-run failure > should cancel > > > > the build. Our smoketester and tests are sometimes a bit picky, and > does not > > > > mean that the artifacts are faulty. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Jan > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> 11. jun. 2021 kl. 04:14 skrev Mayya > Sharipova > > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for > Lucene/Solr > > > > 8.9.0 > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene- > > > > solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with > this > > > > command: > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> python3 -u > dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene- > > > > solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > i.e. until > > > > 2021-06-16 02:00 UTC. > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> Here is my +1 > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:01:43.815224] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev- > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev- > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev- > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev- > > > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Adrien > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Atri > > > > Apache Concerted > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
