I will be working on LUCENE-9334, I will try to finish it soon. On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:40 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> There are also deprecations to remove: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638 > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:43 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Looks like just LUCENE-9334 remains? >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:18 PM Julie Tibshirani <juliet...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello everyone! I will pick up LUCENE-9908. >> > >> > >> > I had marked LUCENE-9583 as a blocker but I'm on board with removing >> its blocker status given we can make changes later. I hope to come back to >> the issue soon with some ideas. >> > >> > >> > Julie >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:42 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I agree that we can remove the blocker status from LUCENE-9583 and >> take advantage of the fact that these new APIs are experimental to improve >> things later. >> >> >> >> For the renaming issue, maybe we could just make vectors plural for >> now for consistency and revisit other options later. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:21 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Thanks Adrien; I plan to tackle LUCENE-9905. >> >>> >> >>> I don't have ideas about how to move forward on LUCENE-9583; I spent >> >>> significant amount of time trying various permutations on that API, >> >>> and what we have was the best compromise I could find at the time, so >> >>> I'm not sure I agree it's a Blocker, yet I'm open to improvements. >> >>> Maybe Julie will propose something? >> >>> >> >>> There is also a vector-related renaming issue Tomoko had opened, which >> >>> I thought was marked Blocker, but I guess no longer is. Previously I >> >>> had hoped to get some strong consensus, but that proved challenging. >> >>> Given that, I'm OK leaving things as-is, marking these apis >> >>> @experimental and potentially revisiting naming issues later, eg once >> >>> we have a second vector ANN implementation. >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:07 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > Hi Mike, >> >>> > >> >>> > Here's what I know about the remaining blockers: >> >>> > >> >>> > LUCENE-9908 - Move VectorValues#search to VectorReader and >> LeafReader >> >>> > This was discussed on the mailing list and it looks like there was >> agreement on making that change. If someone has cycles and can take it, >> please go ahead, otherwise I'll try to allocate some time to it. I'm >> expecting this change to be rather straightforward. >> >>> > >> >>> > LUCENE-9905 - Revise approach to specifying NN algorithm >> >>> > This is a change to how we've been thinking about configuring the >> ANN algorithm. I don't know if someone plans to work on it. >> >>> > >> >>> > LUCENE-9583 - How should we expose VectorValues.RandomAccess >> >>> > We'd like to get rid of this sub interface, but I'm not the best >> person to comment on how much work this needs. Maybe Mike S or Julie can >> give more info. >> >>> > >> >>> > LUCENE-9334 - Require consistency between data-structures on a >> per-field basis >> >>> > Mayya has been working on this one and it's very close. >> >>> > >> >>> > LUCENE-9047 - Directory APIs should be little endian >> >>> > Ignacio and Julie have been working on this one and it is close as >> well. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:59 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Michael, did you get a chance to mark the issues you were thinking >> of as blockers? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Adrien, I see that the remaining open blockers look mostly like >> your open issues. Two of them have recent activity, but LUCENE-9047 would >> need to be brought back to the lucene repo. Is this an accurate view of the >> state of things? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Now that I'm done with 8.8.2, I would love to see how we can >> continue to make headway on 9.0! >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:25 PM Michael Sokolov < >> msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> There has been some discussion around a few code visibility and >> naming >> >>> >>> issues related to "VectorFormat" as it is called today. I'd like >> to >> >>> >>> get that sorted out before 9.0 - I'll hunt up the ticket(s) and >> mark >> >>> >>> as blockers >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:02 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Hello Jan, >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > The list of blockers should be mostly up-to-date: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9661?jql=project%3D%22Lucene%20-%20Core%22%20and%20priority%3DBlocker%20and%20fixVersion%3D%22main%20(9.0)%22 >> . >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:21 PM Jan Høydahl < >> jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Hi, >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Where are we at with the Lucene 9.0 release planning? >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> The git split is largely done. Not sure about the build. >> >>> >>> >> Let's update the umbrella issue >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9375 for known remaining >> cleanup tasks. >> >>> >>> >> The one on that list is releaseWizard, but as Adrien says >> there are also other scripts that need updating. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Jan >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> 13. jan. 2021 kl. 15:10 skrev Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com >> >: >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> +1 to start planning 9.0. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Since you mentioned the Gradle build, I believe that we still >> need to migrate some of the release tooling from Ant to Gradle, e.g. >> dev-tools/scripts/addBackcompatIndexes.py. These scripts are not easy to >> test without actually doing a release so the 9.0 RM might have some >> debugging to do. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:17 PM Michael Sokolov < >> msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> Hi everyone, as we head into a new year full of optimism, is >> it time >> >>> >>> >>> to start discussing the next major release? We released 8.0 >> on Jun 18, >> >>> >>> >>> 2019, over 18 months ago. Since then we've switched to a >> gradle-based >> >>> >>> >>> build. We have added vector-valued fields and an HNSW >> neighbor search >> >>> >>> >>> algorithm for them. At the same time Solr has been getting a >> major >> >>> >>> >>> overhaul which should justify a release, I think? IIRC there >> was talk >> >>> >>> >>> of making 9.0 be the first release of Solr as its own TLP. Is >> it time >> >>> >>> >>> to start planning for that now? >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> -Mike >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> -- >> >>> >>> >> Adrien >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > -- >> >>> >>> > Adrien >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Adrien >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Adrien >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
