I think build & distribution oriented efforts shouldn't be held up by a feature-freeze. FF is more for getting stability on runtime code. But this is Adrien's call.
~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:09 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > This sounds good to me Dawid. Please update this thread when you are done > and I will proceed with branching. > > Le ven. 29 oct. 2021 à 20:13, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> >> Hi Adrien, >> >> Can you hold for LUCENE-10200? There is a patch under LUCENE-10192 that >> restructures the binary distribution - nobody spoke anything so I assume >> everyone liked it?... :) >> >> I'll try to polish the remaining little issues over the weekend so it >> should be good for Tuesday but I'd give it a few eyes before we create the >> branch? Alternatively, we can make a branch and just cherry-pick the >> necessary changes there. I think it's easier if they land on main though. >> >> Dawid >> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:00 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hearing no objections, I will be moving forward with the plan I outlined >>> above. Next Monday is a holiday in France so I'll actually be cutting >>> branch_8_11, branch_9x and branch_9_0 on Tuesday. >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:40 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Mike, your previous email suggests that you would like someone else >>>> to step up. If that's correct I'm happy to be the release manager for both >>>> 8.11 and 9.0. >>>> >>>> Thanks, that would be very welcome! >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:33 PM Timothy Potter <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Sounds like a good plan Adrien, thanks for nailing down some concrete >>>> > milestones and dates :-) >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Tim >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:04 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > +1 Adrien. Thanks for moving things along. >>>> > > >>>> > > ~ David Smiley >>>> > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> For visibility, I recently opened a new issue about a case of >>>> index corruption which is a blocker for 9.0. Nhat is looking into it. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> We've been discussing releasing 9.0 for a long time now and I >>>> think that everybody agrees with moving forward, there's even some good >>>> momentum around making the build and release tooling ready. So I'd like to >>>> propose the following timeline for the 9.0 release to get some feedback: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> 2021-11-01: Feature freeze: >>>> > >> - branch_9x gets created from main >>>> > >> - branch_8_11 gets created from branch_8x >>>> > >> This gives us ~2 weeks to do some last-minute work. The reasoning >>>> for doing 8.11 as well is that we have some enhancements merged to >>>> branch_8x that I suspect some users would like to see released in 8.x. >>>> Important note: 8.11 will be the last minor release of major version 8. >>>> There might be new patch releases in the future such as 8.11.1 or 8.11.2, >>>> but there won't be a 8.12 or a 8.13. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> 2021-11-04: First RC for 8.11 >>>> > >> Since we had 8.10 not long ago, hopefully the release process will >>>> go smoothly. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> ~2021-11-10: First RC for 9.0 >>>> > >> The date is indicative, the plan would be to move forward with the >>>> first 9.0 RC as soon as the following conditions are met: >>>> > >> - 8.11 is out >>>> > >> - all 9.0 blockers have been addressed >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Mike, your previous email suggests that you would like someone >>>> else to step up. If that's correct I'm happy to be the release manager for >>>> both 8.11 and 9.0. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:54 PM Michael Sokolov < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Yes! I'm curious to give it a go, but getting pulled in many >>>> different >>>> > >>> directions. If nobody else steps up, I will be free to shepherd >>>> the >>>> > >>> release along in a couple of weeks, assuming the current >>>> firestorm >>>> > >>> subsides... >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:54 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > +1 >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > Blockers seem to be done with. So I guess we just need an RM to >>>> get the ball rolling? :) >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > I know that the Release Wizard in new Lucene repo needs some >>>> updates https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9809 - I may help >>>> some with that... >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > Cross-ref other 9.0 release mail-threads: >>>> > >>> > - "Now that 8.10 is out ... let's get rolling on 9!" >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r868028d42a19ae02d5bbe2e3329da26869045002b9bb4760b8056c56%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>>> > >>> > - "9.0 release": >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bef0af668860fdbfedb4b58261efd01d9fb26dc280915284c121065%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > Jan >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > 17. aug. 2021 kl. 11:13 skrev Adrien Grand <[email protected]>: >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > +1 to your suggestions >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > I just commented on LUCENE-9959 to suggest reverting since the >>>> changes are currently half baked and I don't think that they should block >>>> 9.0. There are no other blockers left to my knowledge. >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:24 PM Michael Sokolov < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> It's been two years since our last release, we had lots of +1 >>>> when we >>>> > >>> >> raised this last December, and IMO we are close to baked at >>>> this >>>> > >>> >> point. >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> I checked JIRA and found two remaining Blockers >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10016 >>>> > >>> >> VectorReader.search needs rethought, o.a.l.search integration? >>>> > >>> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638 Remove >>>> deprecated >>>> > >>> >> code in main >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> The first one is very close to resolved; >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> On the deprecations, the issue has lingered for 1-1/2 years >>>> now, and >>>> > >>> >> some progress has been made, but more work remains. Some new >>>> > >>> >> deprecations have been added since it was opened too. Maybe we >>>> make a >>>> > >>> >> concerted effort to clean out as much as we can, and then >>>> decide if >>>> > >>> >> it's enough? Anyway this seems to be the only outstanding >>>> issue, so >>>> > >>> >> let's see if we can make progress there >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> Q: any other blockers? >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > -- >>>> > >>> > Adrien >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> -- >>>> > >> Adrien >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Adrien >>> >>
