The Solr change has been merged. There's a good bugfix for concurrent
search that has been approved: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/431,
so I'll wait for this one to be merged to branch_8_11 and I'll resume
building a release candidate.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:35 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, can you let me know when it's merged?
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
>> After additional discussion on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15762 I think there is a
>> small patch that would be nice to include for 8.11 if there is still time.
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 5:05 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All blockers are now addressed, I'll proceed with building a release
>>> candidate.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:51 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Jan!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 2:32 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I added a PR https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2603 for
>>>>> SOLR-14438, that I had in the workings. I think it will do...
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. nov. 2021 kl. 10:34 skrev Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Joel recommended not treating SOLR-15762 as a blocker, so we are left
>>>>> with the following issues as blockers:
>>>>>  - SOLR-15706, which should hopefully be addressed soon.
>>>>>  - SOLR-14438, which hasn't had activity for a long time. Is someone
>>>>> looking into it? Can someone comment on whether it should actually be
>>>>> treated as a blocker for 8.11?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:32 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason's above issue isn't fixed yet but it looks like we should be
>>>>>> able to have a fix in the very near future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However we seem to still have these two other open Solr blockers for
>>>>>> 8.11:
>>>>>>  - SOLR-14438 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14438>: Mention
>>>>>> decodeAES in LICENSE.txt
>>>>>>  - SOLR-15762 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15762>: 
>>>>>> IllegalStateException:
>>>>>> Recursive update thrown when executing complex Join queries
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone who is more familiar with Solr than I am help confirm
>>>>>> that we should indeed treat these two issues as blockers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:45 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This looks bad indeed. Please feel free to backport to 8.11 and
>>>>>>> update this thread when you are done?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:24 PM Jason Gerlowski <
>>>>>>> gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Adrien,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A pretty bad bug in Solr backups came in last week or so:
>>>>>>>> SOLR-15706.
>>>>>>>> If it's not too late I'd like to try to get it into 8.11.  Would
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> be ok?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm just digging into things now so I don't have a complete
>>>>>>>> understanding yet, but I'm optimistic it won't long delay your
>>>>>>>> timeline for cutting the RC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:31 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Assuming CI is green and no blockers have been raised until then,
>>>>>>>> I plan to build the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 8.11 on
>>>>>>>> Thursday November 4th.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Please let me know if you are aware of any blocker that we should
>>>>>>>> address before building the first RC.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Adrien
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Adrien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Adrien
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Adrien
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrien
>


-- 
Adrien

Reply via email to