On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:19 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And you get two single-valued fields instead of one big multi-valued > > field... so I'm not sure I am convinced that "dim mixing" is typically a > > good thing. > > Mixing enables the user to model multiple (of their) fields within a > single Lucene field. You may have a very lightweight and > loosely-managed "schema" (think lots of data suppliers all wanting to > add their field names, but with no access to update the index schema) > that you want to model in a carefully managed set of (Lucene) index > fields. >
I do get that you have a use-case for it. I just personally think it is atypical. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
