Thanks Julie for summarizing the issues.
I've got SUCCESS on the second run:

SUCCESS! [1:45:55.377066]

So, +1 from me as well.

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 4:04 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:

> I found a way to disable the log4shell patch on my work machine, and got a
> pass:
>
> SUCCESS! [1:00:57.577806]
>
> I don't think we need to be concerned about trying to adapt to this
> thing. It only conflicts with the test framework, and devs can turn it
> off to run tests. Somehow our automated builds don't seem to be
> affected.
>
> so, +1 from me
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:38 PM Patrick Zhai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Julie, thanks for summarizing the issues, for 4, as far as I
> understand, there's nothing that needs to be changed on lucece's end. We're
> still having trouble running the smoke test on Amazon's machine, but I've
> tried it on my own machine and it passed.
> >
> > So here's my +1. SUCCESS! [0:59:35.291572]
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:26 PM Julie Tibshirani <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone, people have run into several test failures, here's a
> summary to make it easier to follow:
> >>
> >> Some tests can be very slow with certain random parameters, and this
> can cause the smoke tester to take several hours -- this seems like a
> test-only problem, and we're working to address it in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10473.
> >> TestMatchAllDocsQuery#testEarlyTermination can fail with assertion --
> this is a test-only issue, and has already been fixed in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10472.
> >>
> TestIndexWriterMergePolicy#testStressUpdateSameDocumentWithMergeOnGetReader
> can OOM -- this is a known issue and is not expected to occur outside of
> tests (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10088)
> >> Security manager issues from Amazon's log4shell patch -- not sure this
> requires a change on our end? It sounds like Mike is investigating the
> issues now (thanks!)
> >> Test suite may also stall on some machines? -- Uwe mentioned "Looks
> like a problem with the test or some wrong assumption or some missing
> synchronized block (the Policeman Jenkins machine has many cores, so issues
> with not synchronized cache lines can happen easily)." Is this a different
> problem from #1 where we just have slow tests? I'm not sure if this is
> something we want to investigate as part of the release or if we think it
> can wait.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Julie
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:17 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We had to do a workaround in our internal test suites by setting a
> >>> system property to trick this thing into not running; Maybe we can
> >>> apply that also here...
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:12 PM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > I think this is Amazon trying to cope with log4shell - they've added
> >>> > external instrumentation.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:51 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > >>   2>    at
> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:521)
> >>> > > >>   2>    at Log4jHotPatch.asmVersion(Log4jHotPatch.java:71)
> >>> > > >>   2>    at Log4jHotPatch.agentmain(Log4jHotPatch.java:93)
> >>> > > >>   2>    ... 6 more
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Does anyone have an idea?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Your JVM is broken, look at this Log4jHotPatch stuff causing
> trouble.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to