Assuming there are no strong objections, I merged the PR. This is effective
from now on.
In brief, a CHANGES entry can refer Jira issues or GItHub pull requests. In
the latter case, Jira issue is not required or is optional (it's up to the
author).



2022年4月30日(土) 12:29 Tomoko Uchida <[email protected]>:

> The pull request receives one approval and a few comments. Feedback is
> welcome, thank you.
>
> There are no effects on the current contribution workflow though, this
> could slightly change the forms of communication (some people will continue
> to use both Jira and GitHub as before, some people might tend to use GitHub
> only).
>
> I am not familiar with how to proceed with such workflow changes;
> according to the "lazy consensus" concept that is well described on this
> page, I plan to merge it with an example CHANGES entry later next week if
> there are no objections.
> https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
>
> Tomoko
>
>
> 2022年4月29日(金) 22:01 Tomoko Uchida <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> I guess this has been discussed before (several times). Once again, I
>> would propose to relax the requirement for creating JIRA account/issue when
>> contributing.
>>
>> LUCENE-10545 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545> allows
>> CHANGES.txt to directly mention to GitHub PR (to be exact, I just fixed the
>> obsoleted link to the repository) so that developers can skip opening a
>> JIRA if he/she is ready to start the conversation with a working PR.
>> To see how it will work, please see the associated PR on it - this
>> includes a concrete example.
>>
>> Please note that this does not replace Jira with Github (we still
>> absolutely need issues for discussion and migrating Jira issue to GitHub
>> issue is out of the scope here), but provides an option for developers who
>> already have working patches.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Tomoko
>>
>

Reply via email to