[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114400#comment-13114400
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
-----------------------------------

The token vs. wildcard difference may be small because the number of distinct 
indexed token values is small.  I'm going to try something bigger to see if the 
difference gets larger.

There are good reasons to stick with the wildcard approach, having to do with 
documents that aren't indexed using Manifold.  You really want them to be 
treated as if they are "open"; the token-based approach will cause them to be 
excluded, unfortunately.  So I'm hoping the numbers stay good for wildcards.  
I'm going to try a few tricks Simon taught me to limit the number of query 
rewrites on those clauses, in order to make it as fast as possible.

I don't understand the filter being so slow, however.  That is indeed a 
surprise.  As a result, I'll be attaching a query-based patch shortly.


> ManifoldCF SearchComponent plugin for enforcing ManifoldCF security at search 
> time
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SearchComponents - other
>            Reporter: Karl Wright
>              Labels: document, security, solr
>             Fix For: 3.5, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LCFSecurityFilter.java, LCFSecurityFilter.java, 
> LCFSecurityFilter.java, LCFSecurityFilter.java, 
> SOLR-1895-service-plugin.patch, SOLR-1895-service-plugin.patch, 
> SOLR-1895.patch, SOLR-1895.patch, SOLR-1895.patch, SOLR-1895.patch, 
> SOLR-1895.patch, SOLR-1895.patch
>
>
> I've written an LCF SearchComponent which filters returned results based on 
> access tokens provided by LCF's authority service.  The component requires 
> you to configure the appropriate authority service URL base, e.g.:
>   <!-- LCF document security enforcement component -->
>   <searchComponent name="lcfSecurity" class="LCFSecurityFilter">
>     <str 
> name="AuthorityServiceBaseURL">http://localhost:8080/lcf-authority-service</str>
>   </searchComponent>
> Also required are the following schema.xml additions:
>    <!-- Security fields -->
>    <field name="allow_token_document" type="string" indexed="true" 
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>    <field name="deny_token_document" type="string" indexed="true" 
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>    <field name="allow_token_share" type="string" indexed="true" 
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>    <field name="deny_token_share" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false" 
> multiValued="true"/>
> Finally, to tie it into the standard request handler, it seems to need to run 
> last:
>   <requestHandler name="standard" class="solr.SearchHandler" default="true">
>     <arr name="last-components">
>       <str>lcfSecurity</str>
>     </arr>
> ...
> I have not set a package for this code.  Nor have I been able to get it 
> reviewed by someone as conversant with Solr as I would prefer.  It is my 
> hope, however, that this module will become part of the standard Solr 1.5 
> suite of search components, since that would tie it in with LCF nicely.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to