Sorry I missed the first vote I think; also +1(pmc) from me. I'd be OK with some issues (esp. closed ones) being orphaned in the old system too.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:20 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm fine with either system (or both used concurrently). There is significant > research effort Tomoko did already and I support this effort: +1 from me. > > Dawid > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:40 PM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi everyone! >> >> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub >> issue from Jira. >> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be good >> for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not familiar >> with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term >> committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform. >> >> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current Jira >> issues, and a draft migration plan in [2]. >> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal. >> >> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> *IMPORTANT NOTE* >> I set a local protocol for this vote. >> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be effective if >> it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from committers >> (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC member votes are >> counted for the final result, the votes from all committers are important to >> make the vote result effective. >> >> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand the >> term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters after >> the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the result. >> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are >> decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good >> outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4]. >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 >> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene >> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person or >> virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore >> cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain >> explicit feedback. >> >> Tomoko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
