>
> the problem is a bug in optimization of Hotspot, it is clearly a problem
> with JDK 17+ which is currently to be fixed.
>

I see that https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283386
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283386?focusedCommentId=14496153&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14496153>
is
marked as duplicate of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8275610. A
client has a JVM failure on JDK 17.0.3 that matches
PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work.

Is that failure now tracked under
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8285835? I noticed that the JDK-8285835
only list 18, 19, 20 as the affected versions. Is it possible that the
metadata wasn't updated to include JDK 17 when JDK-8283386 was closed?

Kevin Risden


On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 1:08 PM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Those loops are fine, the problem is a bug in optimization of Hotspot, it
> is clearly a problem with JDK 17+ which is currently to be fixed. There is
> NOTHING to change in Lucene.
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Yuti G <gan.y...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 16, 2022 6:48 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/jdk-17.0.2) - Build #
> 34604 - Failure!
>
>
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing an example of the for loop in the facet code here.
>
>
>
> I have been working on some facet code changes recently and have seen this
> kind of iterator-based loop several times. I can open a Jira issue and
> submit a PR to change these for loops in the facet module.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Yuting Gan
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 2:09 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> That’s again the same bug we have already seen in facet module:
>
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283386?focusedCommentId=14496153&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14496153
>
>
>
> It’s a bad one and already exists in JDK 17 GA.
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 16, 2022 8:19 AM
> *To:* Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> *Cc:* bui...@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/jdk-17.0.2) - Build #
> 34604 - Failure!
>
>
>
>
>
> JVM failure (on JDK 17.0.2!).
>
> #
>
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>
> #
>
> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fe6a986f711, pid=1132974, tid=1137900
>
> #
>
> # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.2+8 (17.0.2+8) (build 
> 17.0.2+8)
>
> # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.2+8 (17.0.2+8, mixed mode, 
> sharing, tiered, compressed class ptrs, parallel gc, linux-amd64)
>
> # Problematic frame:
>
> # V  [libjvm.so+0xad6711]  PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work(Node*, 
> bool)+0x101
>
> #
>
> # No core dump will be written. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core 
> dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
>
> #
>
> # An error report file with more information is saved as:
>
> # 
> /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-main-Linux/lucene/codecs/build/tmp/tests-cwd/hs_err_pid1132974.log
>
> #
>
> # Compiler replay data is saved as:
>
> # 
> /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-main-Linux/lucene/codecs/build/tmp/tests-cwd/replay_pid1132974.log
>
> #
>
> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>
> #   https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues
>
> #
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:30 AM Policeman Jenkins Server <
> jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/34604/
> Java: 64bit/jdk-17.0.2 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC
>
> All tests passed
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: builds-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: builds-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to