OK, how does this sound: if there is a (JDK19 AdoptOpenJDK) release this week as it seems there should be, and you are able to fast-follow with the Lucene changes to use it then I can re-spin RC2 on Monday or Tuesday.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 1:35 PM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > FYI, here (https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium/issues/171) Eclipse says: > > * Add website banner (automate* via github workflow in website > repository) - Announce that we target releases to be available within > 48-72 hours of the GA tags being available > > Uwe > > Am 21.09.2022 um 14:31 schrieb Uwe Schindler: > > Hi, > > > > I will check later today how long it took last time in March. I would > > have expected that they just need to wait until the builds and tests > > are done so it gets released. > > > > I don't want to hold up the release. The vote is still ongoning, so we > > have all options. > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 21.09.2022 um 14:05 schrieb Michael Sokolov: > >> I see; I would kind of like to get the release out before ApacheCon > >> NA, which starts Oct 3. Do you think it's likely AdoptOpenJDK will > >> release its JDK19 in the next week (say by Sep 26)? > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 4:32 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> JDK 19 was released yesterday and I am still waiting for > >>> AdoptOpenJDK to publish Gradle Toolchain compatible releases to be > >>> available. To me the schedule is a bit bad: Just on the day of the > >>> possibility to add (optional) support for JDK 19 Panama powered > >>> MMAP, we started the release. > >>> > >>> I would really like to have a JDK 19 release that adds support for > >>> JDK 19 preview (it can only be tested for exactly the JDK 19 series, > >>> won't work with JDK 20), so we should have a release including the > >>> new code between now and March (ideally before XMAS). > >>> > >>> Options we have > >>> > >>> Let the 9.4.0 release go out now and add a 9.5.0 in a month or so (I > >>> would be release manager). I do not want to add a bugfix release as > >>> theres a small API change (MMAPDirectory ctor changes from int -> > >>> long parameter for chunk size). We can name this release as the > >>> "Java 19 release for early adopters" > >>> Wait a few days and respin the release after > >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/912 went in? The code is > >>> thoroughly tested by Policeman Jenkins since several months, just > >>> the compilation does not work out of box until theres a Temurin > >>> build of OpenJDK 19. > >>> > >>> I just repeat, the above PR does not change any productive code, so > >>> it should be bug-free. It only adds a few class files which are only > >>> used when you pass "--enable-preview" to your JDK. This makes it > >>> easy for users to check Solr or Elasticsearch with JDK 19. No risk, > >>> it only activates when you enable it. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Uwe > >>> > >>> Am 02.09.2022 um 21:42 schrieb Michael Sokolov: > >>> > >>> NOTICE: > >>> > >>> Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable > >>> branch. > >>> > >>> Please observe the normal rules: > >>> > >>> * No new features may be committed to the branch. > >>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be > >>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you > >>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review > >>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our > >>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. > >>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be > >>> committed > >>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into > >>> the current release branch. > >>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual. > >>> However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch > >>> while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the > >>> addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the > >>> branch > >>> may become more difficult. > >>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.4 and priority "Blocker" will > >>> delay > >>> a release candidate build. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Uwe Schindler > >>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >>> https://www.thetaphi.de > >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
