It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 8 (8 binding) 0 0 -1 0
This vote has PASSED. On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:22 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:27:27.923430] > > I also see the same GPG warning as Mike S but it's likely a local gpg > problem for me too ;) > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> (I don't really believe the .asc files are broken; probably a local >> gpg problem I don't understand) >> >> SUCCESS! [0:44:08.338731] >> +1 from me >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:18 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > the second build succeeded. I really think it was another job running >> at same time that also tried to communicate with GPG and used another home >> dir. >> > >> > Log: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/25/console >> > >> > SUCCESS! [1:43:46.817984] >> > Finished: SUCCESS >> > >> > After jenkins finished the job it killed all child processes and all >> agents are gone. >> > >> > In the meantime I also did some manual checks: Running Luke from >> windows with whitespace in dir worked and I was able to open my test index. >> I also started with Java 19 and --enable-preview and the Luke log showed >> that it uses the new MMapDire impl. >> > >> > I correct my previous vote: ++1 to release. 😁 >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am 18.11.2022 um 16:06 schrieb Uwe Schindler: >> > >> > I had also seen this message. My guess: Another build was running in >> Jenkins that also spawned an agent with different home dir! I think Robert >> already talked about this. We should kill the agents before/after we have >> used them. >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am 18.11.2022 um 15:47 schrieb Adrien Grand: >> > >> > Reading Uwe's error message more carefully, I had first assumed that >> the GPG failure was due to the lack of an ultimately trusted signature, but >> it seems like it's due to "can't connect to the agent: IPC connect call >> failed" actually, which suggests an issue with the GPG agent? >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:00 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I got this message when initially downloading the artifacts: >> >> >> >> Downloading >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-src.tgz.asc >> >> File: >> /tmp/smoke_lucene_9.4.2_858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db/lucene.lucene-9.4.2-src.tgz.gpg.verify.log >> >> verify trust >> >> GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted >> signature! >> >> >> >> is it related? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:43 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > The problem is: it is working like this since years - the 9.4.1 >> release worked fine. No change! >> >> > >> >> > And I can't configure this because GPG uses its own home directory >> setup by smoke tester (see paths below). So it should not look anywhere >> else? In addition "gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found" is just a >> warning, it should not cause gpg to exit. >> >> > >> >> > Also why does it only happens at the time of Maven? It checks >> signatures before, too. This is why I restarted the build: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/25/console (still >> running) >> >> > >> >> > Uwe >> >> > >> >> > Am 18.11.2022 um 14:21 schrieb Adrien Grand: >> >> > >> >> > Uwe, the error message suggests that Policeman Jenkins is not >> ultimately trusting any of the keys. Does it work if you configure it to >> ultimately trust your "Uwe Schindler (CODE SIGNING KEY) < >> uschind...@apache.org>" key (which I assume you would be ok with)? >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 2:18 PM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I am restarting the build, maybe it was some hickup. Interestingly >> it only failed for the Maven dependencies. P.S.: Why does it import the key >> file over and over? It would be enough to do this once at beginning of >> smoker. >> >> >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 18.11.2022 um 14:12 schrieb Uwe Schindler: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> I get a failure because your key is somehow rejected by GPG (Ubuntu >> 22.04): >> >> >> >> >> >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/24/console >> >> >> >> >> >> verify maven artifact sigs command "gpg --homedir >> /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg --import >> /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/KEYS" failed: gpg: >> keybox >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg/pubring.kbx' >> created gpg: >> /home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Release-Tester/smoketmp/lucene.gpg/trustdb.gpg: >> trustdb created gpg: key B83EA82A0AFCEE7C: public key "Yonik Seeley < >> yo...@apache.org>" imported gpg: can't connect to the agent: IPC connect >> call failed gpg: key E48025ED13E57FFC: public key "Upayavira < >> u...@odoko.co.uk>" imported [...] gpg: key 051A0FAF76BC6507: public key >> "Adrien Grand (CODE SIGNING KEY) <jpou...@apache.org>" imported [...] >> gpg: key 32423B0E264B5CBA: public key "Julie Tibshirani (New code signing >> key) <juliet...@apache.org>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 62 >> gpg: imported: 62 gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found >> >> >> It looks like for others it succeeds? No idea why. Maybe Ubuntu >> 22.04 has a too-new GPG or it needs to use gpg2? >> >> >> >> >> >> -1 to release until this is sorted out. >> >> >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 17.11.2022 um 15:18 schrieb Adrien Grand: >> >> >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.2 >> >> >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db >> >> >> >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-11-20 >> 15:00 UTC. >> >> >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Adrien >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Adrien >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Uwe Schindler >> >> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > -- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> > -- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> -- Adrien