reorder arguments of Field constructor to be more intuitive
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: LUCENE-3470
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3470
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 4.0
I think Field should take (name, value, type) not (name, type, value) ?
This seems more intuitive and consistent with previous releases
Take this change to some code I had for example:
{noformat}
- d1.add(new Field("foo", "bar", Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
+ d1.add(new Field("foo", TextField.TYPE_STORED, "bar"));
{noformat}
I think it would be better if it was
{noformat}
document.add(new Field("foo", "bar", TextField.TYPE_STORED));
{noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
