I propose to improve the message on an exception already thrown.
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You propose to throw an exception containing this, right?
>
> > Java does not throw SecurityException if this
> is the case, it just ignores the jar!
>
> Are you serious?
>
> On Wed, 17 May, 2023, 8:02 am Gus Heck, <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Blaming?
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:05 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Having that explicitly called out would have been SUPER helpful.
>>>
>>> Blaming Java in an exception thrown by Lucene is a ridiculous idea.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 17 May, 2023, 3:33 am Gus Heck, <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Found it.
>>>>
>>>> It's a solr thing made worse by the interaction of lucene testutils and
>>>> jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath's decision to hide anything gone wrong
>>>> when checking a URL
>>>> /*
>>>> * Checks whether the resource URL should be returned.
>>>> * Returns null on security check failure.
>>>> * Called by java.net.URLClassLoader.
>>>> */
>>>> public static URL checkURL(URL url) {
>>>> if (url != null) {
>>>> try {
>>>> check(url);
>>>> } catch (Exception e) {
>>>> return null;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> return url;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Yay. Fun. JDK classes swallowing exceptions silently.
>>>>
>>>> At the start of this it only took me a little while to discover that
>>>> there
>>>> was a security manager in play via debugging. Remembering that I saw
>>>> emails
>>>> about that, I went to jira, found the ticket enabling it by default in
>>>> 9.x
>>>> and eventually tracked down the name of the security policy file by
>>>> reading
>>>> solr.in.sh and /bin/solr... The key issue that tripped me up is that
>>>> the
>>>> tests have a *separate* security policy file, and there was pretty much
>>>> no
>>>> way to know this without extensive reading of the build. Thus I got
>>>> thrown
>>>> off track when
>>>>
>>>> permission java.io.FilePermission
>>>> "${user.home}${/}.m2${/}repository${/}-", "read";
>>>>
>>>> To solr/server/etc/security.policy had no effect. That and the fact
>>>> that
>>>> no security exception was reported, led me to start chasing increasingly
>>>> improbable hypotheses. Many hours later when I went back to debugging
>>>> deeply into class loading, I found that the code was actually reading
>>>> the
>>>> jar files in question, and then I finally caught it throwing a security
>>>> exception during my debugging.
>>>>
>>>> It turns out that adding the above permission to
>>>> gradle/testing/randomization/policies/solr-tests.policy allows the test
>>>> to
>>>> pass. [1]
>>>>
>>>> I think we need to document this somewhere (or someone needs to point
>>>> me to
>>>> the doc I missed, FWIW I hit this basically following the process in
>>>> dev-docs/dependency-upgrades.adoc treating lucene like a dependency, and
>>>> unaware that there is a "shortcut" mode for lucene specifically in
>>>> gradle/lucene-dev/lucene-dev-repo-composite.gradle and I find reading
>>>> that
>>>> file none-to clear anyway)
>>>>
>>>> That's the solr part, the lucene part is that the security exception is
>>>> hit
>>>> when in org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec$Holder.<clinit>(Codec.java:58)
>>>> when org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv#before
>>>> does
>>>>
>>>> savedCodec = Codec.getDefault();
>>>>
>>>> The error message "An SPI class of type org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec
>>>> with
>>>> name 'Lucene95' does not exist." was moderately misleading because the
>>>> file
>>>> and the services files in the jar definitely did exist. This message
>>>> should
>>>> vary if there is an installed security manager, maybe saying something
>>>> like:
>>>>
>>>> "An SPI class of type org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name
>>>> 'Lucene95'
>>>> does not exist. We have detected that a security manager is installed
>>>> so it
>>>> is also possible that the jar containing the codec is inaccessible under
>>>> the current security policy. (Java does not throw SecurityException if
>>>> this
>>>> is the case, it just ignores the jar!)" [2]
>>>>
>>>> Having that explicitly called out would have been SUPER helpful.
>>>>
>>>> -Gus
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16804
>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12300
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 3:17 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > random guess - does it have something to do with modules?
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:14 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I hadn't seen that one. Thanks, I'll look at it. It already looks a
>>>> bit
>>>> > confusing though since it seems to have options for pointing to a
>>>> repo, but
>>>> > I appear to be pulling the jars successfully from .m2/repository
>>>> already...
>>>> > (except then they don't work, so successful means I see them in the
>>>> > classpath of the relevant classloader). And if we can't deploy a
>>>> valid jar
>>>> > to mavenLocal for some reason (tweaked the solr build so it sees
>>>> > mavenLocal()), (or solr can't consume such a jar) that seems like an
>>>> issue
>>>> > for whichever one is breaking that.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Debugging: The JDK appears to be attempting to load the services
>>>> file
>>>> > from modules, but not seeing the lucene module. (just the jdk ones)
>>>> Also it
>>>> > passes through a block that says:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > // not in a package of a module defined to this loader
>>>> > > for (URL url : findMiscResource(name)) {
>>>> > >
>>>> > > (but then iterates
>>>> > jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader#nameToModule.values() to load
>>>> things
>>>> > anyway)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -Gus
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:54 AM Houston Putman <
>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Gus, I haven't done this myself, but are you using the instructions
>>>> > provided in Solr's
>>>> "gradle/lucene-dev/lucene-dev-repo-composite.gradle"?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> It looks like you need to specify the development lucene version
>>>> > differently than other dependencies...
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> - Houston
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:14 AM Michael Sokolov <
>>>> msoko...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> doh I actually read your email and you said you already checked
>>>> that -
>>>> > >>> I'm going to send out one of those "sokolov would like to retract
>>>> the
>>>> > >>> previous email" emails. Does GMail even pretend to do that? I
>>>> don't
>>>> > >>> know what's going on there! sorry
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:13 AM Michael Sokolov <
>>>> msoko...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>> >
>>>> > >>> > sorry - META-INF not WEB-INF
>>>> > >>> >
>>>> > >>> > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:12 AM Michael Sokolov <
>>>> msoko...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>> > >
>>>> > >>> > > You are probably missing the contents of WEB-INF in your
>>>> custom
>>>> > jar?
>>>> > >>> > > Roughly speaking the files in there define run-time-bound
>>>> > "services"
>>>> > >>> > > that are looked up by name by the JDK's service-loader API.
>>>> > >>> > >
>>>> > >>> > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 9:33 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Cross posting to lucene on the possibility that folks here
>>>> are
>>>> > more likely to add customized lucene to Solr and recognize what I'm
>>>> > stumbling on? (zero responses on solr list)
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Note that the specific test that I happened to copy is not
>>>> the
>>>> > issue, all tests are doing this (or at least so many tests are
>>>> failing I
>>>> > can't see the ones that are passing easily).
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> > >>> > > > From: Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>
>>>> > >>> > > > Date: Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:50 PM
>>>> > >>> > > > Subject: Running 10.0 build with a custom lucene 9.5
>>>> > >>> > > > To: <d...@solr.apache.org>
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Lucene:
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > I made a tweak to lucene for something I'm investigating,
>>>> gave
>>>> > it a new version, deployed to mavenLocal()
>>>> > >>> > > > I have verified that the jars are built with correct
>>>> > META-INF/services files
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Solr:
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > I added mavenLocal() in gradle/globals.gradle
>>>> > >>> > > > I removed the license file sha1 sigs for the default lucene
>>>> &
>>>> > creates signatures for my test version
>>>> > >>> > > > I updated versions.props
>>>> > >>> > > > I updated versions.lock
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Now when I run individual solr tests via my ide they seem to
>>>> > pass, but virtually every test run via gradle fails with something
>>>> like:
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > org.apache.solr.embedded.TestJettySolrRunner > classMethod
>>>> FAILED
>>>> > >>> > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec.getDefault(Codec.java:141)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.before(TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.java:137)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:42)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
>>>> > >>> > > > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > Caused by:
>>>> > >>> > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An SPI class of
>>>> type
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name 'Lucene95' does not exist.
>>>> You
>>>> > need to add the corresponding JAR file supporting this SPI to your
>>>> > classpath. The current classpath supports the following names: []
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.util.NamedSPILoader.lookup(NamedSPILoader.java:113)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec$Holder.<clinit>(Codec.java:58)
>>>> > >>> > > > ... 19 more
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > org.apache.solr.embedded.TestJettySolrRunner > classMethod
>>>> FAILED
>>>> > >>> > > > java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> > java.base/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:221)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec.setDefault(Codec.java:151)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.after(TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.java:292)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:49)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
>>>> > >>> > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
>>>> > >>> > > > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > org.apache.solr.embedded.TestJettySolrRunner > test suite's
>>>> > output saved to
>>>> >
>>>> /Users/gus/projects/apache/solr/code/solr/solr/test-framework/build/test-results/test/outputs/OUTPUT-org.apache.solr.embedded.TestJettySolrRunner.txt,
>>>> > copied below:
>>>> > >>> > > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec.getDefault(Codec.java:141)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.before(TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.java:137)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:42)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>>> > >>> > > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > > Caused by:
>>>> > >>> > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An SPI
>>>> class of
>>>> > type org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name 'Lucene95' does not
>>>> exist.
>>>> > You need to add the corresponding JAR file supporting this SPI to your
>>>> > classpath. The current classpath supports the following names: []
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.util.NamedSPILoader.lookup(NamedSPILoader.java:113)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec$Holder.<clinit>(Codec.java:58)
>>>> > >>> > > > > ... 19 more
>>>> > >>> > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > java.base/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:221)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec.setDefault(Codec.java:151)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.after(TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.java:292)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:49)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> org.apache.lucene.tests.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:47)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> > org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:390)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> >
>>>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.lambda$forkTimeoutingTask$0(ThreadLeakControl.java:850)
>>>> > >>> > > > > at
>>>> java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>>> > >>> > > > 2> NOTE: Mac OS X 12.6 aarch64/Azul Systems, Inc. 11.0.19
>>>> > (64-bit)/cpus=10,threads=1,free=235002360,total=268435456
>>>> > >>> > > > 2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestJettySolrRunner]
>>>> > >>> > > > 2> NOTE: reproduce with: gradlew test --tests
>>>> > TestJettySolrRunner -Dtests.seed=2FB768B5A303764 -Dtests.asserts=true
>>>> > -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > The only difference I've been able to determine is that the
>>>> IDE
>>>> > does not run the test with a security manager, but that feels like a
>>>> red
>>>> > herring since nothing is throwing security exception (or if it is,
>>>> it's
>>>> > getting swallowed!).
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > I have debugged and I can see that the classloaders have
>>>> the new
>>>> > lucene jars I built on the classpath (in /Users/gus/.m2/repository as
>>>> they
>>>> > should), but I haven't yet figuree out why the services are not
>>>> loading.
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > -Gus
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > --
>>>> > >>> > > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> > >>> > > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > >
>>>> > >>> > > > --
>>>> > >>> > > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> > >>> > > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> > > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>
--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)
