Hello,
This change would be correct, but it would only save work when the
conjunction is exhausted, and add overhead otherwise?
Le sam. 30 sept. 2023, 16:20, YouPeng Yang <yypvsxf19870...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi
> I am reading the code of class ConjunctionDISI .and about the method
> nextDoc , Suppose that the sub-disi is emtpy in the lead1.lead2,should
> there be that it can return immediately when the input doc==NO_MORE_DOCS?
>
>
> private int doNext(int doc) throws IOException {
> advanceHead:
> for (; ; ) {
> assert doc == lead1.docID();
> //assumpt doc==NO_MORE_DOCS ,it return
> if(doc==NO_MORE_DOCS){
> return NO_MORE_DOCS;
> }
> // find agreement between the two iterators with the lower costs
> // we special case them because they do not need the
> // 'other.docID() < doc' check that the 'others' iterators need
> final int next2 = lead2.advance(doc);
> if (next2 != doc) {
> doc = lead1.advance(next2);
> if(doc==NO_MORE_DOCS){
> return NO_MORE_DOCS;
> }
> if (next2 != doc) {
> continue;
> }
> }
> ..left omited...
> }
>
