Thank you. I think this is better. Some of the dev branches we have in the repo don't make any particular sense but these long-standing dev branches from which releases were cut seem more important.
Dawid On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:01 PM Chris Hegarty <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > > To close the loop on this. > > Tombstone branch_9x PR raised and merged. > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13882 > > -Chris. > > > On 10 Oct 2024, at 11:27, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thank you, Chris! > > > > Dawid > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:23 PM Chris Hegarty > <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > > If that is what was done previously, then sure let’s just do that. > > > > I’ll restore branch_9x and then prepare PR to wipe it’s contents and > place with a readme pointing to branch_9_12. > > > > -Chris. > > > > > On 10 Oct 2024, at 11:17, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok, thank you. Disappearing branches are a bit puzzling if you have a > tracking branch locally. For branch_8x, we removed > > > the content and left a note stating what happened: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/branch_8x > > > > > > This still refers to branch_9x, for example. Maybe we should do the > same for branch_9x - redirect people to the next > > > major dev branch but leave the label? There are ways of protecting > commits to dead branches as well, to prevent accidental > > > commits. > > > > > > Dawid > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:13 PM Chris Hegarty > <christopher.hega...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi Dawid, > > > > > > > On 10 Oct 2024, at 10:57, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... Has someone removed branch_9x entirely from the origin git? > > > > > > Yes, that was me, see > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8nvnqm7njjho7df99fjx6dxm4zcr7dhj > > > > > > Before removing I checked that there was nothing in that branch that > is not already in branch_9_12. > > > > > > > I'd think we'd like to keep the label, even if the branch is not > meant for any future development, similar to branch_8x that still exists in > lucene-solr repo. > > > > > > I thought that deleting it was the right thing to do, but we can > restore the label or something if you think that useful? > > > > > > -Chris. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
