SUCCESS! [1:37:01.495562]

+1

-Chris.

> On 16 Dec 2024, at 17:20, Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> SUCCESS! [1:54:16.305613]
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 4:32 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> SUCCESS! [1:16:40.906176]
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:05 AM Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok, thanks for clarifying Jim, that means we go ahead with th RC1 vote, 
>>> unless there are objections.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Luca
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024, 08:37 jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Sorry for the mix-up, Adrien's comment reminded me how deletes work in 
>>>> block joins. So the PR is more of an "optimisation" and can wait for 
>>>> another release.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 at 23:13, Marcus Eagan <marcusea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The PR looks great! I also agree with the comment from Adrien at first 
>>>>> glance. I wield no binding vote and have no dog in the fight, except I 
>>>>> hope I didn’t introduce the “bug.”
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marcus Eagan
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:20 Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>> Thanks for flagging this.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Could you clarify what versions are affected by the bug you mentioned 
>>>>>> and when it was introduced?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Luca
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024, 10:18 jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Luca,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We found a bug in the bulk scorer of the ToParentBlockJoinQuery where 
>>>>>>> deleted documents aren’t handled correctly. This causes deleted docs to 
>>>>>>> be collected when the scorer is used.
>>>>>>> The issue was introduced in Lucene 9.12.0, and its impact is quite 
>>>>>>> significant. I’ve opened a fix here and would like to propose adding it 
>>>>>>> to the upcoming release since we already missed 9.12.1.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 23:00, Luca Cavanna <java...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.1.0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.1.0-RC1-rev-6a0531b0f48a0e781a7f72e9639c5f94138118ea
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.1.0-RC1-rev-6a0531b0f48a0e781a7f72e9639c5f94138118ea
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-12-17 
>>>>>>>> 23:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Here is my +1
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to