I have already branched and just sent the freeze notice. However, the process still allows critical fixes, and I suggest that this is such a critical issue requiring a fix.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 8:43 AM Shubham Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > Created an issue here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15662. > > Thanks and Regards, > Shubham Sharma > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 1:36 PM Shubham Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I did some investigations (git bisect on the commits) on this, I will >> create an issue and add my investigations there and will share the issue >> link here. >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Shubham Sharma >> >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 1:27 PM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Looking at the commits I would expect is this >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15585. The shared prefetch >>> counter can add quite a bit of contingency. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 1:19 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> There is a big regression on January 29th: >>>> https://benchmarks.mikemccandless.com/2026.01.29.14.59.00.html. Let's >>>> address it before starting the release process? It's not clear to me which >>>> change is responsible for this big slowdown. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 6:07 PM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I pushed the fix. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 4:59 PM Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the heads up Ignacio. >>>>>> >>>>>> I plan on starting this process tomorrow morning at my time (UTC-5). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 11:47 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Ben, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to add this bug fix that I opened today >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15657. It has already been >>>>>>> reviewed and the impact is well isolated inside the lucene polygon >>>>>>> Tessellator. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ignacio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 4:37 PM Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey y'all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am going to start the release process today. Please let me know >>>>>>>> if there are any outstanding/important issues. I see various PRs, but >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>> issues flagged for the 10.4 milestone. Nothing stood out to me as >>>>>>>> absolutely critical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ben Trent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 2:00 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 I've been willing to update the benchmark against Tantivy with >>>>>>>>> the block size bump to 256 (annotation JK on nightly benchmarks >>>>>>>>> https://benchmarks.mikemccandless.com/AndHighHigh.html) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 27 janv. 2026, 18:02, Benjamin Trent < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey y'all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's been some time since we have had a minor release, and the >>>>>>>>>> change log for 10.4 is growing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There are a number of outstanding newish PRs with 10.4 >>>>>>>>>> milestones. I am trying to ping their authors to see if we can move >>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>> forward. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have any work in particular they really want to get >>>>>>>>>> into 10.4? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will happily be RM. I am going to start the process next week >>>>>>>>>> if we are ready. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ben Trent >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adrien >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Adrien >>>> >>>
