This was caused by a PR I merged yesterday, just pushed a fix.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 5:45 AM Policeman Jenkins Server via builds <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/65287/
> Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-27-ea+23 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED:
> org.apache.lucene.misc.search.TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector.testInvalidArguments
>
> Error Message:
> java.lang.AssertionError: The top-reader used to create Weight is not the
> same as the current reader's top-reader
> (org.apache.lucene.index.CompositeReaderContext@27882911
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.AssertionError: The top-reader used to create Weight is not the
> same as the current reader's top-reader
> (org.apache.lucene.index.CompositeReaderContext@27882911
>         at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([9079BE70AA18DBC2:C19EB49208A50502]:0)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery$TermWeight.scorerSupplier(TermQuery.java:123)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.search.LRUQueryCache$CachingWrapperWeight.scorerSupplier(LRUQueryCache.java:829)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.tests.search.AssertingWeight.scorerSupplier(AssertingWeight.java:61)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.scorerSupplier(BooleanWeight.java:300)
>         at
> org.apache.lucene.misc.search.TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector$DocValueScoreQuery$1.scorerSupplier(TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector.java:560)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.tests.search.AssertingWeight.scorerSupplier(AssertingWeight.java:61)
>         at [email protected]
> /org.apache.lucene.search.Weight.bulkScorer(Weight.java:171)
>         at
> org.apache.lucene.misc.search.TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector.testInvalidArguments(TestDiversifiedTopDocsCollector.java:138)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to