On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that's ok as long as I can say that a .frq file could plausibly end > up in my Directory because it's documented to belong to a codec I was using. > > (And also maybe we shouldn't insist on using the same extensions over and > over again. I guess the original motivation for 3-letter extension names > came from a certain stone age operating system, but I think we are free to > use even 4+ letters now ;) ) >
I guess a better example would be Sep codec. It uses .frq, but it has different meaning to this codec (its actually JUST frequencies, doc deltas are in .doc). Maybe we should think about situations like this, if we end out with codecs like PFOR-delta using .frq extension with a different "meaning" I could see confusion... -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
