[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13120217#comment-13120217
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2809:
----------------------------------------
{quote}no need to modify any of the guts of the complex
SolrCore.getSearcher(){quote}
That code should be removed entirely, better now in 4.x.
The unique id per searcher idea would work, however it needs to also implement
a retry when a given id no longer exists.
Still, this would be best implemented in the context of rewriting distributed
search and the getSearcher code. Otherwise is layering hacked up code on top
of further hacked up code. It's a mess to debug and change later.
> searcher leases
> ---------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>
> Leases/reservations on searcher instances would give us the ability to use
> the same searcher across phases of a distributed search, or for clients to
> send multiple requests and have them hit a consistent/unchanging view of the
> index. The latter requires something extra to ensure that the load balancer
> contacts the same replicas as before.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
