[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13120812#comment-13120812
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3433:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
this looks like a very big change to me. you should open an issue and uplaod a
patch so we can see how that looks like for variable bytes etc.
{quote}
Well this is just discussion? Basically I'm trying to shoot for some
simplification here.
As far as variable bytes, maybe DocValues shouldn't actually implement variable
bytes,
but instead is used only to implement the docid -> offset part. In other words,
the variable bytes
is basically like stored fields today, and docvalues just does the FDX part.
This means
docvalues doesnt need a variable bytes impl at all, you just use a Long impl.
For the "FDT" part of variable bytes we could have something else? then this
would simplify
DocValues some more and narrow its scope.
> Random access non RAM resident IndexDocValues (CSF)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3433
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3433.patch
>
>
> There should be a way to get specific IndexDocValues by going through the
> Directory rather than loading all of the values into memory.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
