[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13126640#comment-13126640
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1726:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
right, we would have to add that support to Lucene first.
{quote}
I think this isnt bad from the high level: we just generalize
searchAfter(ScoreDoc after, Query query, Filter filter, ..) to
searchAfter(ScoreDoc after, Query query, Filter filter, Sort sort, ...)
The problem is that there are 87 different specialized sorting collectors, and
searchAfter by score seems to be the real
lucene use case, for 'deep paging thru results not sorted by score' I would use
a database instead!
I'm not against us adding it, just not motivated to for those reasons.
> Deep Paging and Large Results Improvements
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1726
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.5, 4.0
>
>
> There are possibly ways to improve collections of "deep paging" by passing
> Solr/Lucene more information about the last page of results seen, thereby
> saving priority queue operations. See LUCENE-2215.
> There may also be better options for retrieving large numbers of rows at a
> time that are worth exploring. LUCENE-2127.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
