[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13141287#comment-13141287
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2861:
------------------------------------

bq.  as I said - we can not rely on the order these logs are printed

I think we can rely on that order, and have seen nothing to indicate otherwise.

bq. #those two happen at the same time roughly

Right, hence my comment "The update to id:98 may or may not be in the resulting 
reader above"
But then after the *next* openIfChanged() should definitely reflect the update.

bq. this doesn't seem like a bug in lucene no?

It absolutely looks like a lucene bug.
But given that it seems to only happen with a mix of hard and soft commits, it 
should be easier to track down.  First guess: maybe 
DirectoryReader.applyDeletes is false when it should be true.
                
> transaction log / realtime-get failures 
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2861
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2861
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>         Attachments: TEST-org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.xml, 
> fail11.xml, fail13_postfix.xml, fail4.xml, fail5.xml, jenkins_output.txt, 
> solr_debug.patch, trunk-0.txt
>
>
> realtime-get or the transaction log fails sometimes

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to